1. Daniel Diatkine (1946-2024)
The article highlights the practical capacity of the gift relationship to infiltrate and subvert market logic. It draws its arguments from an extension of the phenomenological approach developed by Ricœur in Paths of Recognition. Successively examining the logical, ethical, and practical dimensions...
Wedi'i Gadw mewn:
| Prif Awduron: | , , |
|---|---|
| Fformat: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Iaith: | Français |
| Cyhoeddwyd: |
2025
|
| Mynediad Ar-lein: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| id |
cairn-CEP1_088_0010 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
cairn |
| spelling |
cairn-CEP1_088_0010CEP1Cahiers d'économie politique https://shs.cairn.info/revue-cahiers-deconomie-politique-2025-3-page-10?lang=fr https://doi.org/10.3917/cep1.088.0010 1. Daniel Diatkine (1946-2024) Benetti, CarloCartelier, JeanDeleplace, Ghislain2025 fre Cahiers d'économie politique | 88 | 3 | 2025-12-24 | p. 10-17 | 0154-8344 CEP1_08844 The article highlights the practical capacity of the gift relationship to infiltrate and subvert market logic. It draws its arguments from an extension of the phenomenological approach developed by Ricœur in Paths of Recognition. Successively examining the logical, ethical, and practical dimensions of generous giving, it illuminates the dialectic between love and justice that underlies it, rooted in the ethics of gratitude. As evidenced by the analysis of transactions involving both gift and sale, placed under the register of gratitude, the gift is an expression of the ethical desire to live well together, in mutual kindness and care. The subversive power of the gift over market logic stems from the strength of this desire. While the gift wields this power at the risk of its own corruptions, it nevertheless demonstrates that the ethical desire from which it draws is a profound source of resistance and opposition to the generalization of market logic, and by extension, to the unreason of capitalism.L’article met en valeur la capacité pratique de la relation de don à infiltrer et à subvertir la logique marchande. Il tire ses arguments d’un prolongement de l’approche phénoménologique développée par Ricœur dans Parcours de la Reconnaissance. Examinant successivement les dimensions logiques, éthiques et pratiques du don généreux, il met en lumière la dialectique de l’amour et de la justice qui le sous-tend et dont les ressorts résident dans l’éthique de la gratitude. Comme l’analyse des transactions mêlant don et vente en témoigne, placé sous le registre de la gratitude, le don est l’expression du désir éthique de bien-vivre ensemble, dans la bienveillance mutuelle et la sollicitude. Le pouvoir subversif du don par rapport à la logique marchande provient de la force de ce désir. Certes le don exerce ce pouvoir au péril de ses propres corruptions ; il témoigne néanmoins du fait que le désir éthique dans lequel il puise est une source profonde de résistance et d’opposition à la généralisation de la logique marchande et, par extension, à la déraison du capitalisme.Cairn restricted access |
| language |
Français |
| format |
Article ou chapitre numérique |
| building |
0/Bibliothèque numérique/ 1/Bibliothèque numérique/Cairn/ |
| description |
The article highlights the practical capacity of the gift relationship to infiltrate and subvert market logic. It draws its arguments from an extension of the phenomenological approach developed by Ricœur in Paths of Recognition. Successively examining the logical, ethical, and practical dimensions of generous giving, it illuminates the dialectic between love and justice that underlies it, rooted in the ethics of gratitude. As evidenced by the analysis of transactions involving both gift and sale, placed under the register of gratitude, the gift is an expression of the ethical desire to live well together, in mutual kindness and care. The subversive power of the gift over market logic stems from the strength of this desire. While the gift wields this power at the risk of its own corruptions, it nevertheless demonstrates that the ethical desire from which it draws is a profound source of resistance and opposition to the generalization of market logic, and by extension, to the unreason of capitalism. |
| author |
Benetti, Carlo Cartelier, Jean Deleplace, Ghislain |
| spellingShingle |
Benetti, Carlo Cartelier, Jean Deleplace, Ghislain 1. Daniel Diatkine (1946-2024) |
| author_facet |
Benetti, Carlo Cartelier, Jean Deleplace, Ghislain |
| author_sort |
Benetti, Carlo |
| title |
1. Daniel Diatkine (1946-2024) |
| title_short |
1. Daniel Diatkine (1946-2024) |
| title_full |
1. Daniel Diatkine (1946-2024) |
| title_fullStr |
1. Daniel Diatkine (1946-2024) |
| title_full_unstemmed |
1. Daniel Diatkine (1946-2024) |
| title_sort |
1. daniel diatkine (1946-2024) |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| container_title |
|
| container_issue |
|
| url |
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://shs.cairn.info/revue-cahiers-deconomie-politique-2025-3-page-10?lang=fr https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.3917/cep1.088.0010 |
| _version_ |
1877245596307292160 |