Le RN à l’Assemblée nationale : derrière les cravates, la réalité ?
Electrifying the individual mobility is one of the means to meet the environmental imperatives of the energy transition in the transport sector, which emits the most carbon dioxide in France. The distribution of electric vehicles (EV) to replace convention vehicles is therefore one of the elements p...
Wedi'i Gadw mewn:
| Prif Awdur: | |
|---|---|
| Fformat: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Iaith: | Français |
| Cyhoeddwyd: |
2024
|
| Mynediad Ar-lein: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Crynodeb: | Electrifying the individual mobility is one of the means to meet the environmental imperatives of the energy transition in the transport sector, which emits the most carbon dioxide in France. The distribution of electric vehicles (EV) to replace convention vehicles is therefore one of the elements promoted by public policies in many countries. However, this deployment is hampered by the difficulty for people living in buildings to equip themselves with a charging infrastructure for electric vehicles; according to the Housing 2017 survey, collective housing accounts for 44 % of dwellings, two-thirds of which are located in condominiums. Despite the Loi d’Orientation des mobilités supposed to favour this deployment by the establishment of a “right to an electrical outlet”, the acquisition of a charge point in collective housing is an obstacle course. In order to analyse the decision to equip condominiums with CIEV, in 2019 we conducted an exploratory survey of condominiums that carried out this type of installation. The objective was to understand how these pioneering condominiums coped with the arrival of EV and what solutions were implemented, depending on the circumstances and condominium typologies. In this paper, after examining the positions of the actors present within the condominiums, we will show how the process of installing an EV charging infrastructure is organized, by listing the steps taken by the co-owners requesting an installation. Thirdly, we will distinguish between different types of socio-technical configurations of the condominium charging infrastructure and identify what guides the choice for one rather than the other. We will see that the technical configuration of charging in condominiums is correlated with complex installation strategies that themselves depend on the positioning of the three types of actors involved. The central issue of this article is to highlight a paradox: by wanting to unlock access to charging in condominiums, the establishment of a “right to the plug” facilitates individual approaches by co-owners, to the detriment of more collective approaches, which would be the only ones to support the development of the use of electric vehicles in the long term. |
|---|