Dispositifs inclusifs et dispositif stratégique : un tropisme institutionnel souterrain
This article draws in particular on previous works containing analyses, based on Ricœur and Foucault, of the discursive distortions within regulatory texts relating to successive inclusive measures (Clis, Upi, Ulis). Other research has shed light on possible links between resistance to inclusive edu...
সংরক্ষণ করুন:
| প্রধান লেখক: | , |
|---|---|
| বিন্যাস: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| ভাষা: | Français |
| প্রকাশিত: |
2025
|
| বিষয়গুলি: | |
| অনলাইন ব্যবহার করুন: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| সংক্ষিপ্ত: | This article draws in particular on previous works containing analyses, based on Ricœur and Foucault, of the discursive distortions within regulatory texts relating to successive inclusive measures (Clis, Upi, Ulis). Other research has shed light on possible links between resistance to inclusive education in education systems and the achievement of a strategic social objective, as defined by Foucault. In the field of inclusive education, this project would involve, as can be inferred from the Blanc report (2011), aiming to transfer students with disabilities from specialised environments to mainstream environments. Based on these previous results, this article explores the mechanisms whereby invisible barriers reemerge under the new common educational roof via different affiliation methods, at the level of language and institutional practices. These mechanisms are analysed through the prism of “tropism”, from both a professional and institutional viewpoint, drawing on the philosophy of Wittgenstein and on Foucault’s social control approach. |
|---|