Pour une politique féministe à l'âge de la reconnaissance : approche bi-dimensionnelle et justice entre les sexes
In the course of the last thirty years, feminist theories of gender have shifted from quasi-Marxist. labor-centered conceptions to putatively “post-Marxist” culture-and identity-based conceptions. Reflecting the larger political shift “from redistristribution to recognition” this shift has been doub...
Gardado en:
| Auteurs principaux: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Idioma: | Français |
| Publicado: |
2001
|
| Acceso en liña: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Résumé: | In the course of the last thirty years, feminist theories of gender have shifted from quasi-Marxist. labor-centered conceptions to putatively “post-Marxist” culture-and identity-based conceptions. Reflecting the larger political shift “from redistristribution to recognition” this shift has been double-edged. On the one hand, it has broadened feminist concerns to encompass issues of representation, identity, and difference. Yet, in the context of an ascendant neoliberalism, these concerns may be serving to less to enrich feminist struggles for redistribution than to displace the latter. Thus, instead of arriving at a broader, richer paradigm that could encompass both redistribution and recognition, feminists appear to have traded one truncated paradigm for another–a truncated economism for a truncated culturalism. This essay aims to resist that trend. First, I propose an analysis of gender that is broad enough to house the full range of feminist concerns, those central to the old socialist-feminism as well as those rooted in the cultural turn. To complement this analysis, I propose, second, a correspondingly broad conception of justice, capable of encompassing both distribution and recognition, and third, a non-identitarian account of recognition. capable of synergizing with redistribution. I conclude by examining some practical problems that arise when we try to envision institutional reforms that could redress maldistribution and misrecognition simultaneously. |
|---|