L'inconscient au risque de la société, la société au risque de l'inconscient
A three-part debate on the interaction of the Inconscious and Society. At the outset, the limitations of Freud's writings are pointed out : i.e. biologism ; the questionable thesis on child sexuality ; the prevailing ideology on human nature-such fetters preventing pyschoanalysis, through a shi...
Сохранить в:
| Главные авторы: | , |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Язык: | Français |
| Опубликовано: |
1994
|
| Online-ссылка: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Итог: | A three-part debate on the interaction of the Inconscious and Society. At the outset, the limitations of Freud's writings are pointed out : i.e. biologism ; the questionable thesis on child sexuality ; the prevailing ideology on human nature-such fetters preventing pyschoanalysis, through a shift into some pessimistic trend as regards social practice, from considering the material mechanisms in history. Whilst socioanalysis aims precisely at focusing analysis on the subject as socially-conditioned, so that the scope of the Inconscious be integrated and with the prospect of the individual mastering his own action. |
|---|