Advances in cryptology - CRYPTO 87 : proceedings

Zero-knowledge interactive proofsystems are a new technique which can be used as a cryptographic tool for designing provably secure protocols. Goldwasser, Micali, and Rackoff originally suggested this technique for controlling the knowledge released in an interactive proof of membership in a languag...

Descripció completa

Guardat en:
Dades bibliogràfiques
Autor principal: Pomerance, Carl, 19..-
Autor corporatiu: Annual international cryptology conference (Autor)
Format: Livre numérique
Idioma:Anglais
Publicat: Berlin [etc.] : Springer 2003.
Cham : Springer Nature
Col·lecció:Lecture notes in computer science 293
Matèries:
Accés en línia:Accès sur la plateforme de l'éditeur
Accès sur la plateforme Istex
Accès Université d'Orléans
Accès INSA CVL
Nota: Archives Springer e-books (Licence nationale)
Archives Springer e-books (Licence nationale)
Autres localisations: Voir dans le Sudoc
Edition sous un autre format:• Advances in cryptology--CRYPTO '87, proceedings, Carl Pomerance (ed.), Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1988, 1 vol. (460 p.), Lecture notes in computer science, 0-387-18796-0
• Advances in Cryptology - CRYPTO '87, Texte imprimé, 9783540800217
Descripció
Sumari:Zero-knowledge interactive proofsystems are a new technique which can be used as a cryptographic tool for designing provably secure protocols. Goldwasser, Micali, and Rackoff originally suggested this technique for controlling the knowledge released in an interactive proof of membership in a language, and for classification of languages [19]. In this approach, knowledge is defined in terms of complexity to convey knowledge if it gives a computational advantage to the receiver, theory, and a message is said for example by giving him the result of an intractable computation. The formal model of interacting machines is described in [19, 15, 171. A proof-system (for a language L) is an interactive protocol by which one user, the prover, attempts to convince another user, the verifier, that a given input x is in L. We assume that the verifier is a probabilistic machine which is limited to expected polynomial-time computation, while the prover is an unlimited probabilistic machine. (In cryptographic applications the prover has some trapdoor information, or knows the cleartext of a publicly known ciphertext) A correct proof-system must have the following properties: If XE L, the prover will convince the verifier to accept the pmf with very high probability. If XP L no prover, no matter what program it follows, is able to convince the verifier to accept the proof, except with vanishingly small probability.
Descripció de l’ítem:Archives Springer e-books (Licence nationale)
Archives Springer e-books (Licence nationale)
ISBN:9783540481843 (PDF)
ISSN:1611-3349
Accés:Accès en ligne pour les établissements français bénéficiaires des licences nationales
Accès soumis à abonnement pour tout autre établissement
Conditions particulières de réutilisation pour les bénéficiaires des licences nationales. https://www.licencesnationales.fr/springer-nature-ebooks-contrat-licence-ln-2017