La forja de la igualdad
Political philosophy was deeply renovated in the last decades of the twentieth century; at the centre of this «reinassance» was the characterisation of equality as the «sovereign virtue», that is, the fundamental parameter by reference to which to pass normative judgment on social institutions and p...
Đã lưu trong:
| Xuất bản năm: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/tp, |
|---|---|
| Tác giả chính: | |
| Định dạng: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Ngôn ngữ: | Espagnol |
| Được phát hành: |
Teoria politica
2020
|
| Những chủ đề: | |
| Truy cập trực tuyến: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| id |
openedition-oai:revues.org:tp_861 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
openedition |
| spelling |
openedition-oai:revues.org:tp_861 es https://journals.openedition.org/tp/861 2020-05-26T02:00:00Z info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess article info:eu-repo/semantics/article urn:handle:20.500.13089/lha4 All rights reserved La forja de la igualdad Teoria politica Rosenberg & Sellier info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/1972-5477 info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/0394-1248 URI:https://journals.openedition.org/tp Menéndez, Agustín José Equality Freedom Fundamental Rights Social and Democratic State Distribution Political philosophy was deeply renovated in the last decades of the twentieth century; at the centre of this «reinassance» was the characterisation of equality as the «sovereign virtue», that is, the fundamental parameter by reference to which to pass normative judgment on social institutions and practices. The economic, political and cultural context of the rise of equality was the triumph of the Democratic and Social State, which entailed a deep remodeling of the relationships between individual, society and state (Section I). Equality was found to be a social, distributive, complex and contextual virtue, while discussions about the proper «measuring rod» of equality unfolded (Section II). The (not infrequent) paradox is that theoretical debates flourished at the same time that the social bases of egalitarianism started to crack, as western societies became more inegalitarian, as reflected in key socio-economic indicators (such as the GINI coefficient) (Section III). This «inegalitarian transformation» has left its mark on the structure of society, feeding massive existential inequalities, damaging economic welfare and undermining social stability, by means of contributing to the reemergence of social and political authoritarian conceptions (Section IV). Still, there are solid reasons to conclude that policies that resulted in bigger inequalities could only be imposed by cloaking them as egalitarian policies, and that the institutional structure of the Democratic and Social State still holds, even if increasingly under an inegalitarian assault (Section V). In such circumstances, the case for equality has to be made combining politico-philosophical and constitutional analyses, with special attention being paid to the implications of the indivisibility of fundamental rights and to the grammar of egalitarian constitutional law; in particular, the three-fold structure of fundamental positions: subjective rights, collective rights and collective goods (Section VI). |
| collection |
OpenEdition Journal |
| language |
Espagnol |
| format |
Article ou chapitre numérique |
| building |
0/Bibliothèque numérique/ 1/Bibliothèque numérique/OpenEdition Journals/ |
| topic |
Equality Freedom Fundamental Rights Social and Democratic State Distribution |
| spellingShingle |
Equality Freedom Fundamental Rights Social and Democratic State Distribution Menéndez, Agustín José La forja de la igualdad |
| description |
Political philosophy was deeply renovated in the last decades of the twentieth century; at the centre of this «reinassance» was the characterisation of equality as the «sovereign virtue», that is, the fundamental parameter by reference to which to pass normative judgment on social institutions and practices. The economic, political and cultural context of the rise of equality was the triumph of the Democratic and Social State, which entailed a deep remodeling of the relationships between individual, society and state (Section I). Equality was found to be a social, distributive, complex and contextual virtue, while discussions about the proper «measuring rod» of equality unfolded (Section II). The (not infrequent) paradox is that theoretical debates flourished at the same time that the social bases of egalitarianism started to crack, as western societies became more inegalitarian, as reflected in key socio-economic indicators (such as the GINI coefficient) (Section III). This «inegalitarian transformation» has left its mark on the structure of society, feeding massive existential inequalities, damaging economic welfare and undermining social stability, by means of contributing to the reemergence of social and political authoritarian conceptions (Section IV). Still, there are solid reasons to conclude that policies that resulted in bigger inequalities could only be imposed by cloaking them as egalitarian policies, and that the institutional structure of the Democratic and Social State still holds, even if increasingly under an inegalitarian assault (Section V). In such circumstances, the case for equality has to be made combining politico-philosophical and constitutional analyses, with special attention being paid to the implications of the indivisibility of fundamental rights and to the grammar of egalitarian constitutional law; in particular, the three-fold structure of fundamental positions: subjective rights, collective rights and collective goods (Section VI). |
| author |
Menéndez, Agustín José |
| author_facet |
Menéndez, Agustín José |
| author_sort |
Menéndez, Agustín José |
| title |
La forja de la igualdad |
| title_short |
La forja de la igualdad |
| title_full |
La forja de la igualdad |
| title_fullStr |
La forja de la igualdad |
| title_full_unstemmed |
La forja de la igualdad |
| title_sort |
la forja de la igualdad |
| publisher |
Teoria politica |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| container_title |
URI:https://journals.openedition.org/tp |
| url |
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://journals.openedition.org/tp/861 |
| _version_ |
1877294002018975744 |