Archeologia del premierato. Studi per la riforma

The article offers a selective overview of the political science, legal, and historical studies that shaped the Italian debate on the reform of the form of government in order to reconstruct the genesis of the current constitutional reform proposal, promoted by the Meloni government and referred to...

Disgrifiad llawn

Wedi'i Gadw mewn:
Manylion Llyfryddiaeth
Cyhoeddwyd yn:URI:https://journals.openedition.org/tp,
Prif Awdur: Cuono, Massimo
Fformat: Article ou chapitre numérique
Iaith:Italien
Cyhoeddwyd: Teoria politica 2026
Pynciau:
Mynediad Ar-lein:Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
id openedition-oai:revues.org:tp_5933
record_format openedition
spelling openedition-oai:revues.org:tp_5933 it https://journals.openedition.org/tp/5933 2026-05-04T02:00:00Z info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess article info:eu-repo/semantics/article urn:handle:20.500.13089/1667s https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Archeologia del premierato. Studi per la riforma Teoria politica Rosenberg & Sellier info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/1972-5477 info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/0394-1248 URI:https://journals.openedition.org/tp Cuono, Massimo Governability Representation Form of Government Premiership Electoral System rappresentanza forma di governo governabilità primo ministro sistema elettorale The article offers a selective overview of the political science, legal, and historical studies that shaped the Italian debate on the reform of the form of government in order to reconstruct the genesis of the current constitutional reform proposal, promoted by the Meloni government and referred to in public debate as the «premierato». Starting with the debate in the Constituent Assembly, it highlights how the choice of parliamentarianism and the proportional electoral system in 1948 was primarily oriented towards the need to prevent authoritarian drifts, in a context marked by the prominence of mass parties. Furthermore, even in the positions taken by those who defended alternative solutions, the stability of the government was not an end in itself at the time, but rather a means subordinate to the protection of democratic pluralism. The contribution identifies 1975, with the report of the Trilateral Commission and the emergence of the category of «governability», as a theoretical watershed: from that moment on, decision-making efficiency and executive branch stability became priority objectives, fueling systematic criticism of parliamentarianism and proportionalism. This paradigm found wide acceptance in the Italian debate, from the studies of Mortati and Amato to the «Milan Group» and the works of Pasquino, which favoured and accompanied the season of electoral reforms in the 1990s, marking the progressive legitimization of majoritarian and personalized models of democracy. The proposal for a «premiership model» is therefore in line with previous attempts at reform (Berlusconi, Renzi), but it is set in a political context that is more polarized internally and more unstable internationally.
collection OpenEdition Journal
language Italien
format Article ou chapitre numérique
building 0/Bibliothèque numérique/
1/Bibliothèque numérique/OpenEdition Journals/
topic Governability
Representation
Form of Government
Premiership
Electoral System
rappresentanza
forma di governo
governabilità
primo ministro
sistema elettorale
spellingShingle Governability
Representation
Form of Government
Premiership
Electoral System
rappresentanza
forma di governo
governabilità
primo ministro
sistema elettorale
Cuono, Massimo
Archeologia del premierato. Studi per la riforma
description The article offers a selective overview of the political science, legal, and historical studies that shaped the Italian debate on the reform of the form of government in order to reconstruct the genesis of the current constitutional reform proposal, promoted by the Meloni government and referred to in public debate as the «premierato». Starting with the debate in the Constituent Assembly, it highlights how the choice of parliamentarianism and the proportional electoral system in 1948 was primarily oriented towards the need to prevent authoritarian drifts, in a context marked by the prominence of mass parties. Furthermore, even in the positions taken by those who defended alternative solutions, the stability of the government was not an end in itself at the time, but rather a means subordinate to the protection of democratic pluralism. The contribution identifies 1975, with the report of the Trilateral Commission and the emergence of the category of «governability», as a theoretical watershed: from that moment on, decision-making efficiency and executive branch stability became priority objectives, fueling systematic criticism of parliamentarianism and proportionalism. This paradigm found wide acceptance in the Italian debate, from the studies of Mortati and Amato to the «Milan Group» and the works of Pasquino, which favoured and accompanied the season of electoral reforms in the 1990s, marking the progressive legitimization of majoritarian and personalized models of democracy. The proposal for a «premiership model» is therefore in line with previous attempts at reform (Berlusconi, Renzi), but it is set in a political context that is more polarized internally and more unstable internationally.
author Cuono, Massimo
author_facet Cuono, Massimo
author_sort Cuono, Massimo
title Archeologia del premierato. Studi per la riforma
title_short Archeologia del premierato. Studi per la riforma
title_full Archeologia del premierato. Studi per la riforma
title_fullStr Archeologia del premierato. Studi per la riforma
title_full_unstemmed Archeologia del premierato. Studi per la riforma
title_sort archeologia del premierato. studi per la riforma
publisher Teoria politica
publishDate 2026
container_title URI:https://journals.openedition.org/tp
url https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://journals.openedition.org/tp/5933
_version_ 1877291713804894208