La Germania e l’«alternativa» populista
The «populist» movement Alternative für Deutschland, preceded and accompanied by an aggressive cultural «new right», is throwing Germany’s political and cultural system off balance. It challenges the «popular» nature of the traditional Volksparteien (christian-democratic, christian-social, and socia...
שמור ב:
| הוצא לאור ב: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/tp, |
|---|---|
| מחבר ראשי: | |
| פורמט: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| שפה: | Italien |
| יצא לאור: |
Teoria politica
2020
|
| נושאים: | |
| גישה מקוונת: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| id |
openedition-oai:revues.org:tp_342 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
openedition |
| spelling |
openedition-oai:revues.org:tp_342 it https://journals.openedition.org/tp/342 2020-05-26T02:00:00Z info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess article info:eu-repo/semantics/article urn:handle:20.500.13089/lh8b All rights reserved La Germania e l’«alternativa» populista Teoria politica Rosenberg & Sellier info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/1972-5477 info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/0394-1248 URI:https://journals.openedition.org/tp Rusconi, Gian Enrico Populism Volk/völkisch Conservative Revolution German Sovereignty The «populist» movement Alternative für Deutschland, preceded and accompanied by an aggressive cultural «new right», is throwing Germany’s political and cultural system off balance. It challenges the «popular» nature of the traditional Volksparteien (christian-democratic, christian-social, and social democratic). It intends to restore full German political sovereignty within the European Union, as well as sovereignty over its own national history which, until now, has been told only by the victorious nations. It does not hide its ambitions for «cultural hegemony» in contrast to a (still) dominant left-wing and social-liberalist culture, proposing a new way of «being bourgeois and conservative». It counts on the historical significance and emotional effectiveness of the traditional terms Volk and völkisch through which it obsessively reaffirms its ethno-national identity and legitimates of the rejection of the foreigner/immigrant. Naturally, the reprise of the völkisch lexicon raises suspicions and protests because it has typically characterized Nazism. Though the «new right», contentiously insists on its difference from National Socialism, it claims for itself the status of that «conservative revolution» of the twenties and thirties that would have been kidnapped and betrayed by National Socialism. Thus, the «new right» has succeeded in tearing the left from its monopoly in criticizing the current system and has overturned its meaning. Paradoxically, it acknowledges the enemies of the radical left as its own: financial-capitalist neoliberalism, globalization, etc. |
| collection |
OpenEdition Journal |
| language |
Italien |
| format |
Article ou chapitre numérique |
| building |
0/Bibliothèque numérique/ 1/Bibliothèque numérique/OpenEdition Journals/ |
| topic |
Populism Volk/völkisch Conservative Revolution German Sovereignty |
| spellingShingle |
Populism Volk/völkisch Conservative Revolution German Sovereignty Rusconi, Gian Enrico La Germania e l’«alternativa» populista |
| description |
The «populist» movement Alternative für Deutschland, preceded and accompanied by an aggressive cultural «new right», is throwing Germany’s political and cultural system off balance. It challenges the «popular» nature of the traditional Volksparteien (christian-democratic, christian-social, and social democratic). It intends to restore full German political sovereignty within the European Union, as well as sovereignty over its own national history which, until now, has been told only by the victorious nations. It does not hide its ambitions for «cultural hegemony» in contrast to a (still) dominant left-wing and social-liberalist culture, proposing a new way of «being bourgeois and conservative». It counts on the historical significance and emotional effectiveness of the traditional terms Volk and völkisch through which it obsessively reaffirms its ethno-national identity and legitimates of the rejection of the foreigner/immigrant. Naturally, the reprise of the völkisch lexicon raises suspicions and protests because it has typically characterized Nazism. Though the «new right», contentiously insists on its difference from National Socialism, it claims for itself the status of that «conservative revolution» of the twenties and thirties that would have been kidnapped and betrayed by National Socialism. Thus, the «new right» has succeeded in tearing the left from its monopoly in criticizing the current system and has overturned its meaning. Paradoxically, it acknowledges the enemies of the radical left as its own: financial-capitalist neoliberalism, globalization, etc. |
| author |
Rusconi, Gian Enrico |
| author_facet |
Rusconi, Gian Enrico |
| author_sort |
Rusconi, Gian Enrico |
| title |
La Germania e l’«alternativa» populista |
| title_short |
La Germania e l’«alternativa» populista |
| title_full |
La Germania e l’«alternativa» populista |
| title_fullStr |
La Germania e l’«alternativa» populista |
| title_full_unstemmed |
La Germania e l’«alternativa» populista |
| title_sort |
la germania e l’«alternativa» populista |
| publisher |
Teoria politica |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| container_title |
URI:https://journals.openedition.org/tp |
| url |
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://journals.openedition.org/tp/342 |
| _version_ |
1877294001370955776 |