Libero o servo arbitrio? Erasmo e Lutero
The essay connects the dispute between Erasmus and Luther over free will to the modern paradigm of freedom. A paradigm that has a paradoxical nature: freedom is contrary to human nature, is made possible only by grace, or by artifice, or, with an extreme paradox, by coercion. Erasmus and Luther are...
Gardado en:
| Publicado en: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/tp, |
|---|---|
| Autor Principal: | |
| Formato: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Idioma: | Italien |
| Publicado: |
Teoria politica
2025
|
| Sujets: | |
| Acceso en liña: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| id |
openedition-oai:revues.org:tp_3121 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
openedition |
| spelling |
openedition-oai:revues.org:tp_3121 it https://journals.openedition.org/tp/3121 2025-03-21T01:00:00Z info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess article info:eu-repo/semantics/article urn:handle:20.500.13089/13jds https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Libero o servo arbitrio? Erasmo e Lutero Teoria politica Rosenberg & Sellier info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/1972-5477 info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/0394-1248 URI:https://journals.openedition.org/tp Alfieri, Luigi free will spiritual authority secular power spiritual freedom functionalistic view of power libero arbitrio autorità spirituale potere secolare libertà spirituale visione funzionalistica del potere The essay connects the dispute between Erasmus and Luther over free will to the modern paradigm of freedom. A paradigm that has a paradoxical nature: freedom is contrary to human nature, is made possible only by grace, or by artifice, or, with an extreme paradox, by coercion. Erasmus and Luther are among the first founders of this paradigm, playing a still unrecognized role. Neither is an advocate of political freedom, but both place substantial limits on authority, depriving it of essential aspects of human destiny. By demoting authority from value to function, they open up horizons of thought which will then allow for more specifically political perspectives on freedom. |
| collection |
OpenEdition Journal |
| language |
Italien |
| format |
Article ou chapitre numérique |
| building |
0/Bibliothèque numérique/ 1/Bibliothèque numérique/OpenEdition Journals/ |
| topic |
free will spiritual authority secular power spiritual freedom functionalistic view of power libero arbitrio autorità spirituale potere secolare libertà spirituale visione funzionalistica del potere |
| spellingShingle |
free will spiritual authority secular power spiritual freedom functionalistic view of power libero arbitrio autorità spirituale potere secolare libertà spirituale visione funzionalistica del potere Alfieri, Luigi Libero o servo arbitrio? Erasmo e Lutero |
| description |
The essay connects the dispute between Erasmus and Luther over free will to the modern paradigm of freedom. A paradigm that has a paradoxical nature: freedom is contrary to human nature, is made possible only by grace, or by artifice, or, with an extreme paradox, by coercion. Erasmus and Luther are among the first founders of this paradigm, playing a still unrecognized role. Neither is an advocate of political freedom, but both place substantial limits on authority, depriving it of essential aspects of human destiny. By demoting authority from value to function, they open up horizons of thought which will then allow for more specifically political perspectives on freedom. |
| author |
Alfieri, Luigi |
| author_facet |
Alfieri, Luigi |
| author_sort |
Alfieri, Luigi |
| title |
Libero o servo arbitrio? Erasmo e Lutero |
| title_short |
Libero o servo arbitrio? Erasmo e Lutero |
| title_full |
Libero o servo arbitrio? Erasmo e Lutero |
| title_fullStr |
Libero o servo arbitrio? Erasmo e Lutero |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Libero o servo arbitrio? Erasmo e Lutero |
| title_sort |
libero o servo arbitrio? erasmo e lutero |
| publisher |
Teoria politica |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| container_title |
URI:https://journals.openedition.org/tp |
| url |
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://journals.openedition.org/tp/3121 |
| _version_ |
1877292101332369409 |