The Promises and Dangers of Direct Democracy: A Historical Comparison

Delving into the diverse structures, practices, and consequences of direct democracy in the United States and California and in the European Union, Italy, Switzerland, and France, this volume presents striking contrasts. French legal scholars demonstrate an exceedingly cautious, yet somewhat positiv...

詳細記述

保存先:
書誌詳細
出版年:URI:https://journals.openedition.org/siecles,
第一著者: Bolton, Marie
フォーマット: Article ou chapitre numérique
言語:Anglais
出版事項: Siècles 2014
主題:
オンライン・アクセス:Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
id openedition-oai:revues.org:siecles_1072
record_format openedition
spelling openedition-oai:revues.org:siecles_1072 https://doi.org/10.4000/siecles.1072 urn:doi:10.4000/siecles.1072 en https://journals.openedition.org/siecles/1072 2014-10-28T01:00:00Z info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess article info:eu-repo/semantics/article urn:handle:20.500.13089/kp5q All rights reserved The Promises and Dangers of Direct Democracy: A Historical Comparison Siècles Centre d'Histoire "Espaces et Cultures" info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2275-2129 info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/1266-6726 URI:https://journals.openedition.org/siecles Bolton, Marie France États-Unis Union européenne Italie Suisse Californie constitution histoire politique démocratie directe référendum initiative révocation proposition de loi référendaire constitutionnalisme France California Italy Switzerland Europe direct democracy United States constitutionalism political history 20th century 21st century Progressive era Delving into the diverse structures, practices, and consequences of direct democracy in the United States and California and in the European Union, Italy, Switzerland, and France, this volume presents striking contrasts. French legal scholars demonstrate an exceedingly cautious, yet somewhat positive view of the potential promise of direct democracy to increase citizen involvement in decision-making in Europe, while Californian historians cry out in warning of its dangers and negative consequences. Central to the distinctions drawn between American and European systems of direct democracy is the extent to which the influence of money has intruded into the political process, as well as in the United States, the role of the U.S. Supreme Court, and the phenomenon of American constitutionalism. Cherchant à analyser en profondeur les différentes structures, pratiques et conséquences de la démocratie directe aux États-Unis et plus particulièrement en Californie ainsi que dans l’Union Européenne, en Italie, en Suisse et en France, ce numéro de Siècles donne à voir des contrastes frappants. Si les juristes français font preuve d’une lecture très prudente – mais toutefois quelque peu positive – quant à la promesse potentielle que contient la démocratie directe pour permettre l’augmentation de la participation des citoyens dans le processus décisionnel en Europe, à l’opposé, les historiens californiens se répandent en avertissements contre ses dangers et conséquences négatives. Deux éléments permettent d’éclairer les distinctions tracées entre les systèmes américain et européen de démocratie directe : d’une part, le degré d’influence de l’argent dans le processus politique et, d’autre part, aux États-Unis, le rôle de la Cour Suprême des États-Unis et le phénomène du constitutionnalisme américain.
collection OpenEdition Journal
language Anglais
format Article ou chapitre numérique
building 0/Bibliothèque numérique/
1/Bibliothèque numérique/OpenEdition Journals/
topic constitution
histoire politique
démocratie directe
référendum
initiative
révocation
proposition de loi référendaire
constitutionnalisme
France
California
Italy
Switzerland
Europe
direct democracy
United States
constitutionalism
political history
20th century
21st century
Progressive era
spellingShingle constitution
histoire politique
démocratie directe
référendum
initiative
révocation
proposition de loi référendaire
constitutionnalisme
France
California
Italy
Switzerland
Europe
direct democracy
United States
constitutionalism
political history
20th century
21st century
Progressive era
Bolton, Marie
The Promises and Dangers of Direct Democracy: A Historical Comparison
description Delving into the diverse structures, practices, and consequences of direct democracy in the United States and California and in the European Union, Italy, Switzerland, and France, this volume presents striking contrasts. French legal scholars demonstrate an exceedingly cautious, yet somewhat positive view of the potential promise of direct democracy to increase citizen involvement in decision-making in Europe, while Californian historians cry out in warning of its dangers and negative consequences. Central to the distinctions drawn between American and European systems of direct democracy is the extent to which the influence of money has intruded into the political process, as well as in the United States, the role of the U.S. Supreme Court, and the phenomenon of American constitutionalism.
author Bolton, Marie
author_facet Bolton, Marie
author_sort Bolton, Marie
title The Promises and Dangers of Direct Democracy: A Historical Comparison
title_short The Promises and Dangers of Direct Democracy: A Historical Comparison
title_full The Promises and Dangers of Direct Democracy: A Historical Comparison
title_fullStr The Promises and Dangers of Direct Democracy: A Historical Comparison
title_full_unstemmed The Promises and Dangers of Direct Democracy: A Historical Comparison
title_sort promises and dangers of direct democracy: a historical comparison
publisher Siècles
publishDate 2014
container_title URI:https://journals.openedition.org/siecles
url https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.4000/siecles.1072
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://journals.openedition.org/siecles/1072
_version_ 1877294468716036096