Which coercion, which method, which normativity?
The author, like Himma, conceives law as essentially coercive. However, she maintains that his Coercion Thesis lends itself to various criticisms. She also expresses doubts about his views on conceptual analysis and his conclusions regarding the normativity of law. Finally, she believes that Himma p...
Guardat en:
| Publicat a: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/revus, |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | Pintore, Anna |
| Format: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Idioma: | Anglais |
| Publicat: |
Revus
2021
|
| Matèries: | |
| Accés en línia: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
Ítems similars
-
In defence of the Coercion Thesis and modest conceptual methodology
(Article ou chapitre numérique)
Himma, Kenneth Einar
Revus, 2023 -
Bix on the normativity of law
(Article ou chapitre numérique)
Rosati, Connie S.
Revus, 2019 -
A problem for the unambitious view of legal normativity
(Article ou chapitre numérique)
Bertea, Stefano
Revus, 2019 -
Understanding normativity
(Article ou chapitre numérique)
Delacroix, Sylvie
Revus, 2019 -
Coercion, function, and the “why” of law
(Article ou chapitre numérique)
Bix, Brian H.
Revus, 2021