Libertas: On the unity of the concept of freedom

The paper distinguishes two accounts of the relationship between individual and political freedom: the Disunity View (according to which personal and political freedom are not only conceptually distinct but are also incompatible) and the Unity View (which assumes that personal and political freedom...

Descripció completa

Guardat en:
Dades bibliogràfiques
Publicat a:URI:https://journals.openedition.org/revus,
Autors principals: Eliasz, Katarzyna, Załuski, Wojciech
Format: Article ou chapitre numérique
Idioma:Anglais
Publicat: Revus 2020
Matèries:
Accés en línia:Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
id openedition-oai:revues.org:revus_6331
record_format openedition
spelling openedition-oai:revues.org:revus_6331 https://doi.org/10.4000/revus.6331 urn:doi:10.4000/revus.6331 en https://journals.openedition.org/revus/6331 2020-12-11T01:00:00Z info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess article info:eu-repo/semantics/article urn:handle:20.500.13089/k0oz https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ Libertas: On the unity of the concept of freedom Revus Klub Revus info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/1855-7112 info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/1581-7652 URI:https://journals.openedition.org/revus Eliasz, Katarzyna Załuski, Wojciech libertas life in freedom political rights liberal democracy political freedom personal freedom The paper distinguishes two accounts of the relationship between individual and political freedom: the Disunity View (according to which personal and political freedom are not only conceptually distinct but are also incompatible) and the Unity View (which assumes that personal and political freedom are conceptually inseparable, and that thereby freedom is a unitary concept – reminiscent of the Roman-republican libertas). The aim of this paper is to provide several arguments for the Unity View (psychological, conceptual, ‘republican’, and discourse-theoretic). We also argue that the Unity View entails what Ortega y Gasset labeled “life in freedom” (a condition whereby state coercion is not experienced as a limitation of freedom) and that it provides an additional (freedom-based) justification for liberal/constitutional democracy.
collection OpenEdition Journal
language Anglais
format Article ou chapitre numérique
building 0/Bibliothèque numérique/
1/Bibliothèque numérique/OpenEdition Journals/
topic libertas
life in freedom
political rights
liberal democracy
political freedom
personal freedom
spellingShingle libertas
life in freedom
political rights
liberal democracy
political freedom
personal freedom
Eliasz, Katarzyna
Załuski, Wojciech
Libertas: On the unity of the concept of freedom
description The paper distinguishes two accounts of the relationship between individual and political freedom: the Disunity View (according to which personal and political freedom are not only conceptually distinct but are also incompatible) and the Unity View (which assumes that personal and political freedom are conceptually inseparable, and that thereby freedom is a unitary concept – reminiscent of the Roman-republican libertas). The aim of this paper is to provide several arguments for the Unity View (psychological, conceptual, ‘republican’, and discourse-theoretic). We also argue that the Unity View entails what Ortega y Gasset labeled “life in freedom” (a condition whereby state coercion is not experienced as a limitation of freedom) and that it provides an additional (freedom-based) justification for liberal/constitutional democracy.
author Eliasz, Katarzyna
Załuski, Wojciech
author_facet Eliasz, Katarzyna
Załuski, Wojciech
author_sort Eliasz, Katarzyna
title Libertas: On the unity of the concept of freedom
title_short Libertas: On the unity of the concept of freedom
title_full Libertas: On the unity of the concept of freedom
title_fullStr Libertas: On the unity of the concept of freedom
title_full_unstemmed Libertas: On the unity of the concept of freedom
title_sort libertas: on the unity of the concept of freedom
publisher Revus
publishDate 2020
container_title URI:https://journals.openedition.org/revus
url https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.4000/revus.6331
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://journals.openedition.org/revus/6331
_version_ 1877293798690652160