Elective Affinities 2.0?
Although Pierre Bourdieu’s works treated partnership formation, the processual and intersubjective character of mating and the gender-specific resources convoked in reciprocal evaluations and rating practices are blind spots in his perspective based on homophilous lifestyle preferences. Consequently...
Shranjeno v:
| izdano v: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/reset, |
|---|---|
| Glavni avtor: | |
| Format: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Jezik: | Anglais |
| Izdano: |
RESET
2014
|
| Teme: | |
| Online dostop: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| id |
openedition-oai:revues.org:reset_141 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
openedition |
| spelling |
openedition-oai:revues.org:reset_141 https://doi.org/10.4000/reset.141 urn:doi:10.4000/reset.141 en https://journals.openedition.org/reset/141 2014-07-22T02:00:00Z info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess article info:eu-repo/semantics/article urn:handle:20.500.13089/jvrb All rights reserved Elective Affinities 2.0? RESET Association Recherches en sciences sociales sur Internet info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2264-6221 URI:https://journals.openedition.org/reset Schmitz, Andreas marché matrimonial rencontres en ligne Bourdieu classification réciproque données dyadiques partner market online dating Bourdieu reciprocal classification dyadic data Although Pierre Bourdieu’s works treated partnership formation, the processual and intersubjective character of mating and the gender-specific resources convoked in reciprocal evaluations and rating practices are blind spots in his perspective based on homophilous lifestyle preferences. Consequently, this article develops a framework of mating processes extending Bourdieu’s theory and thereby provides a starting point for empirical assessments. Using data taken from a major German online dating provider, the article shows that, due to the dyadic nature of encounters, the pressure of self-presentation and choice and the high degree of competition between many potential partners, online dating is an ideal-type market that enables the detailed study of classificatory processes. Beginning with an elaboration towards a general model of reciprocal classification in mating, refining the Bourdieusian model of partnership formation, the paper explains the data’s structure and its operationalization from methodological and methodical points of view. Finally, a simplified, empirical application of a model of classificatory mating practices is presented and discussed, suggesting that homogeneity (rather than homophily) is reinforced, not undermined, by the technical conditions of online interaction. Si Pierre Bourdieu a bien évoqué les mécanismes de la formation du couple, le caractère processuel et inter-subjectif de la rencontre, comme les ressources spécifiques aux différents genres qui sont mobilisées dans les évaluations réciproques et dans les jugements sentimentaux demeurent des angles morts de sa perspective, fondée sur l'idée d'une homophilie des styles de vie. Cet article présente un cadre théorique pour penser les processus de formation du couple qui élargit la théorie de Bourdieu et constitue ainsi un point de départ pour des investigations empiriques. A partir de données issues de l'un des principaux sites de rencontre allemand, il montre que, du fait de la nature dyadique de la rencontre, de la pression liée à la présentation de soi et à la question du choix, ainsi que du haut degré de compétition entre les partenaires potentiels, les sites de rencontre constituent un marché idéal-typique qui autorise l'étude fine des processus de classification. Nous poserons tout d'abord le cadre d'un modèle général de classification réciproque dans la formation du couple, en raffinant le modèle bourdieusien, avant de présenter la structure des données et leur intérêt méthodologique et méthodique. Enfin, une application empirique simplifiée d'un modèle de rencontre et de classification est présenté. Il suggère que l'homogénéité (plutôt que l'homophilie) est renforcée, et non sapée, par les conditions techniques de l'interaction sur Internet. |
| collection |
OpenEdition Journal |
| language |
Anglais |
| format |
Article ou chapitre numérique |
| building |
0/Bibliothèque numérique/ 1/Bibliothèque numérique/OpenEdition Journals/ |
| topic |
marché matrimonial rencontres en ligne Bourdieu classification réciproque données dyadiques partner market online dating Bourdieu reciprocal classification dyadic data |
| spellingShingle |
marché matrimonial rencontres en ligne Bourdieu classification réciproque données dyadiques partner market online dating Bourdieu reciprocal classification dyadic data Schmitz, Andreas Elective Affinities 2.0? |
| description |
Although Pierre Bourdieu’s works treated partnership formation, the processual and intersubjective character of mating and the gender-specific resources convoked in reciprocal evaluations and rating practices are blind spots in his perspective based on homophilous lifestyle preferences. Consequently, this article develops a framework of mating processes extending Bourdieu’s theory and thereby provides a starting point for empirical assessments. Using data taken from a major German online dating provider, the article shows that, due to the dyadic nature of encounters, the pressure of self-presentation and choice and the high degree of competition between many potential partners, online dating is an ideal-type market that enables the detailed study of classificatory processes. Beginning with an elaboration towards a general model of reciprocal classification in mating, refining the Bourdieusian model of partnership formation, the paper explains the data’s structure and its operationalization from methodological and methodical points of view. Finally, a simplified, empirical application of a model of classificatory mating practices is presented and discussed, suggesting that homogeneity (rather than homophily) is reinforced, not undermined, by the technical conditions of online interaction. |
| author |
Schmitz, Andreas |
| author_facet |
Schmitz, Andreas |
| author_sort |
Schmitz, Andreas |
| title |
Elective Affinities 2.0? |
| title_short |
Elective Affinities 2.0? |
| title_full |
Elective Affinities 2.0? |
| title_fullStr |
Elective Affinities 2.0? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Elective Affinities 2.0? |
| title_sort |
elective affinities 2.0? |
| publisher |
RESET |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| container_title |
URI:https://journals.openedition.org/reset |
| url |
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.4000/reset.141 https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://journals.openedition.org/reset/141 |
| _version_ |
1877243162247823360 |