Schiller versus Fichte: estetización y moralización de lo político en el origen del idealismo alemán

Schiller versus Fichte: estetización y moralización de lo político en el origen del idealismo alemán

The philosophical disagreement between Schiller and Fichte goes beyond what is commonly known as the Horen Dispute. For the central point in this dispute is the confrontation between two ways of conceiving the dialectics of life and thought: on the one hand, a dialectic of identity (Fichte) and on t...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Vydáno v:URI:https://journals.openedition.org/ref,
Hlavní autor: Acosta, Emiliano
Médium: Article ou chapitre numérique
Jazyk:Espagnol
Vydáno: Revista de Estud(i)os sobre Fichte 2026
Témata:
recognition
democracy
Schiller
populism
Horen dispute
On-line přístup:Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
id openedition-oai:revues.org:ref_742
record_format openedition
spelling openedition-oai:revues.org:ref_742 https://doi.org/10.4000/ref.742 urn:doi:10.4000/ref.742 es https://journals.openedition.org/ref/742 2026-06-09T02:00:00Z info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess article info:eu-repo/semantics/article urn:handle:20.500.13089/jqeh All rights reserved Schiller versus Fichte: estetización y moralización de lo político en el origen del idealismo alemán Revista de Estud(i)os sobre Fichte Universidade Federal do Espirito Santo info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2258-014X URI:https://journals.openedition.org/ref Acosta, Emiliano recognition democracy Schiller populism Horen dispute The philosophical disagreement between Schiller and Fichte goes beyond what is commonly known as the Horen Dispute. For the central point in this dispute is the confrontation between two ways of conceiving the dialectics of life and thought: on the one hand, a dialectic of identity (Fichte) and on the other a dialectic of difference (Schiller). These logical devices develop from very different, even contradictory, postulates. While Schiller starts from the primacy of aesthetic reason, Fichte starts from a radicalization of what Kant called the primacy of practical reason.In this article I will offer an analysis of both dialectical devices and the conceptions of recognition, moral and political intersubjectivity, and of the role of the State they offer. As a conclusion, I will briefly outline certain parallelisms between Schiller and Fichte's proposals and two central issues of contemporary democracy: on the one hand, the resignation and/or disenchantment with politics and on the other the anger and distrust of politics and politicians that allows populist (or radical democracy) discourses to gain persuasive force in our societies.
collection OpenEdition Journal
language Espagnol
format Article ou chapitre numérique
building 0/Bibliothèque numérique/
1/Bibliothèque numérique/OpenEdition Journals/
topic recognition
democracy
Schiller
populism
Horen dispute
spellingShingle recognition
democracy
Schiller
populism
Horen dispute
Acosta, Emiliano
Schiller versus Fichte: estetización y moralización de lo político en el origen del idealismo alemán
description The philosophical disagreement between Schiller and Fichte goes beyond what is commonly known as the Horen Dispute. For the central point in this dispute is the confrontation between two ways of conceiving the dialectics of life and thought: on the one hand, a dialectic of identity (Fichte) and on the other a dialectic of difference (Schiller). These logical devices develop from very different, even contradictory, postulates. While Schiller starts from the primacy of aesthetic reason, Fichte starts from a radicalization of what Kant called the primacy of practical reason.In this article I will offer an analysis of both dialectical devices and the conceptions of recognition, moral and political intersubjectivity, and of the role of the State they offer. As a conclusion, I will briefly outline certain parallelisms between Schiller and Fichte's proposals and two central issues of contemporary democracy: on the one hand, the resignation and/or disenchantment with politics and on the other the anger and distrust of politics and politicians that allows populist (or radical democracy) discourses to gain persuasive force in our societies.
author Acosta, Emiliano
author_facet Acosta, Emiliano
author_sort Acosta, Emiliano
title Schiller versus Fichte: estetización y moralización de lo político en el origen del idealismo alemán
title_short Schiller versus Fichte: estetización y moralización de lo político en el origen del idealismo alemán
title_full Schiller versus Fichte: estetización y moralización de lo político en el origen del idealismo alemán
title_fullStr Schiller versus Fichte: estetización y moralización de lo político en el origen del idealismo alemán
title_full_unstemmed Schiller versus Fichte: estetización y moralización de lo político en el origen del idealismo alemán
title_sort schiller versus fichte: estetización y moralización de lo político en el origen del idealismo alemán
publisher Revista de Estud(i)os sobre Fichte
publishDate 2026
container_title URI:https://journals.openedition.org/ref
url https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.4000/ref.742
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://journals.openedition.org/ref/742
_version_ 1877291674332299264

Podobné jednotky