El idealismo de Fichte como “kantismo bien entendido”: dispersión, unidad y Yoidad

El idealismo de Fichte como “kantismo bien entendido”: dispersión, unidad y Yoidad

In the Second Introduction, Fichte constructs and explains his conception of idealism (the Science of Knowledge) in opposition with Kantianism, and more specifically with its dogmatism and empiricism. The criticism of dogmatism –where the I appears fragmented and dispersed in things–, is followed by...

תיאור מלא

שמור ב:
מידע ביבליוגרפי
הוצא לאור ב:URI:https://journals.openedition.org/ref,
מחבר ראשי: Gaudio, Mariano
פורמט: Article ou chapitre numérique
שפה:Espagnol
יצא לאור: Revista de Estud(i)os sobre Fichte 2026
נושאים:
Fichte’s idealism
dispersal
Kantianism properly understood
unity
Selfhood
גישה מקוונת:Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
id openedition-oai:revues.org:ref_613
record_format openedition
spelling openedition-oai:revues.org:ref_613 https://doi.org/10.4000/ref.613 urn:doi:10.4000/ref.613 es https://journals.openedition.org/ref/613 2026-06-09T02:00:00Z info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess article info:eu-repo/semantics/article urn:handle:20.500.13089/jqde All rights reserved El idealismo de Fichte como “kantismo bien entendido”: dispersión, unidad y Yoidad Revista de Estud(i)os sobre Fichte Universidade Federal do Espirito Santo info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2258-014X URI:https://journals.openedition.org/ref Gaudio, Mariano Fichte’s idealism dispersal Kantianism properly understood unity Selfhood In the Second Introduction, Fichte constructs and explains his conception of idealism (the Science of Knowledge) in opposition with Kantianism, and more specifically with its dogmatism and empiricism. The criticism of dogmatism –where the I appears fragmented and dispersed in things–, is followed by that of Kantians that aimed to ground the I in the multiplicity of the given.This criticism leads to Fichte’s interpretation of Kantianism and to a new perspective on the unity and the Selfhood. In this paper, we will begin by analyzing the exhortation to decide between dogmatism and idealism in the First Introduction (1). Then we are going to work on the criticism of dogmatism as dispersion and adhesion to things in Fichte’s later works (2). In this perspective the “Kantianism properly understood” of the Second Introduction appears (3), in order to consider how the unity of the Science of Knowledge is justified (4), according to three moments: (a) the intellectual intuition, (b) the one and the multiple, (c) empiricism. With the I in the center of the study, the reciprocal interrelation and communitarian dimension of the Selfhood will become clear (5). Finally, we are going to make some general consideration on Fichte’s idealism.
collection OpenEdition Journal
language Espagnol
format Article ou chapitre numérique
building 0/Bibliothèque numérique/
1/Bibliothèque numérique/OpenEdition Journals/
topic Fichte’s idealism
dispersal
Kantianism properly understood
unity
Selfhood
spellingShingle Fichte’s idealism
dispersal
Kantianism properly understood
unity
Selfhood
Gaudio, Mariano
El idealismo de Fichte como “kantismo bien entendido”: dispersión, unidad y Yoidad
description In the Second Introduction, Fichte constructs and explains his conception of idealism (the Science of Knowledge) in opposition with Kantianism, and more specifically with its dogmatism and empiricism. The criticism of dogmatism –where the I appears fragmented and dispersed in things–, is followed by that of Kantians that aimed to ground the I in the multiplicity of the given.This criticism leads to Fichte’s interpretation of Kantianism and to a new perspective on the unity and the Selfhood. In this paper, we will begin by analyzing the exhortation to decide between dogmatism and idealism in the First Introduction (1). Then we are going to work on the criticism of dogmatism as dispersion and adhesion to things in Fichte’s later works (2). In this perspective the “Kantianism properly understood” of the Second Introduction appears (3), in order to consider how the unity of the Science of Knowledge is justified (4), according to three moments: (a) the intellectual intuition, (b) the one and the multiple, (c) empiricism. With the I in the center of the study, the reciprocal interrelation and communitarian dimension of the Selfhood will become clear (5). Finally, we are going to make some general consideration on Fichte’s idealism.
author Gaudio, Mariano
author_facet Gaudio, Mariano
author_sort Gaudio, Mariano
title El idealismo de Fichte como “kantismo bien entendido”: dispersión, unidad y Yoidad
title_short El idealismo de Fichte como “kantismo bien entendido”: dispersión, unidad y Yoidad
title_full El idealismo de Fichte como “kantismo bien entendido”: dispersión, unidad y Yoidad
title_fullStr El idealismo de Fichte como “kantismo bien entendido”: dispersión, unidad y Yoidad
title_full_unstemmed El idealismo de Fichte como “kantismo bien entendido”: dispersión, unidad y Yoidad
title_sort el idealismo de fichte como “kantismo bien entendido”: dispersión, unidad y yoidad
publisher Revista de Estud(i)os sobre Fichte
publishDate 2026
container_title URI:https://journals.openedition.org/ref
url https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.4000/ref.613
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://journals.openedition.org/ref/613
_version_ 1877291675977515008

פריטים דומים