Juicio y ser. Kant y Fichte en la encrucijada hacia el romanticismo
It is known that the German poet Friedrich Hölderlin was a passionate reader of Kant. There is evidence of his parallel interest on poetry and philosophy in his personal correspondence, where references to his own poetical production intertwine with references to his main intellectual interests: the...
保存先:
| 出版年: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/ref, |
|---|---|
| 第一著者: | |
| フォーマット: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| 言語: | Espagnol |
| 出版事項: |
Revista de Estud(i)os sobre Fichte
2026
|
| 主題: | |
| オンライン･アクセス: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| id |
openedition-oai:revues.org:ref_425 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
openedition |
| spelling |
openedition-oai:revues.org:ref_425 https://doi.org/10.4000/ref.425 urn:doi:10.4000/ref.425 es https://journals.openedition.org/ref/425 2026-06-09T02:00:00Z info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess article info:eu-repo/semantics/article urn:handle:20.500.13089/jqc9 All rights reserved Juicio y ser. Kant y Fichte en la encrucijada hacia el romanticismo Revista de Estud(i)os sobre Fichte Universidade Federal do Espirito Santo info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2258-014X URI:https://journals.openedition.org/ref Carbó Ribugent, Mònica Fichte Kant idealism Hölderlin romanticism (theory of) judgement It is known that the German poet Friedrich Hölderlin was a passionate reader of Kant. There is evidence of his parallel interest on poetry and philosophy in his personal correspondence, where references to his own poetical production intertwine with references to his main intellectual interests: the study of Kant and the Greeks. Hölderlin, however, was a colleague of Hegel and Schelling during the years in Tübingen, and he attained personally Fichte’s lessons. His peculiar position on the philosophical debate between Kant and Idealism is thoroughly expressed in the manuscript Urtheil und Seyn from 1795. A careful reading of the text provides an account of the tension between Kant’s philosophy and Fichte’s idealistic approach. Hölderlin displays a critical argument against Fichte’s denial of the original unity expressed in the Kantian formula of an “unknown common root”. Such a pre-reflexive unity is discarded by Fichte as being unable to bear fruit, and in its place he posits an absolute principle, the identity of the self, the absolute I. Hölderlin indicates the incoherence of stating as “absolute” something which is reflexive, and therefore a result of a division, thus casting a straightforward attack to the nuclear ground of the idealistic project. Such an attack can ultimately be interpreted either as a sound critique to idealism main principle, but still engaged with the idealistic privileged search of an absolute ground or as a sheer opposition to Idealism -in as much as Hölderlin’s critique seems to emerge out of respect for the Kantian position. However, Hölderlin’s further development of this issue in literary form does not provide an argument to identify his approach to the absolute with that of the romantics. |
| collection |
OpenEdition Journal |
| language |
Espagnol |
| format |
Article ou chapitre numérique |
| building |
0/Bibliothèque numérique/ 1/Bibliothèque numérique/OpenEdition Journals/ |
| topic |
Fichte Kant idealism Hölderlin romanticism (theory of) judgement |
| spellingShingle |
Fichte Kant idealism Hölderlin romanticism (theory of) judgement Carbó Ribugent, Mònica Juicio y ser. Kant y Fichte en la encrucijada hacia el romanticismo |
| description |
It is known that the German poet Friedrich Hölderlin was a passionate reader of Kant. There is evidence of his parallel interest on poetry and philosophy in his personal correspondence, where references to his own poetical production intertwine with references to his main intellectual interests: the study of Kant and the Greeks. Hölderlin, however, was a colleague of Hegel and Schelling during the years in Tübingen, and he attained personally Fichte’s lessons. His peculiar position on the philosophical debate between Kant and Idealism is thoroughly expressed in the manuscript Urtheil und Seyn from 1795. A careful reading of the text provides an account of the tension between Kant’s philosophy and Fichte’s idealistic approach. Hölderlin displays a critical argument against Fichte’s denial of the original unity expressed in the Kantian formula of an “unknown common root”. Such a pre-reflexive unity is discarded by Fichte as being unable to bear fruit, and in its place he posits an absolute principle, the identity of the self, the absolute I. Hölderlin indicates the incoherence of stating as “absolute” something which is reflexive, and therefore a result of a division, thus casting a straightforward attack to the nuclear ground of the idealistic project. Such an attack can ultimately be interpreted either as a sound critique to idealism main principle, but still engaged with the idealistic privileged search of an absolute ground or as a sheer opposition to Idealism -in as much as Hölderlin’s critique seems to emerge out of respect for the Kantian position. However, Hölderlin’s further development of this issue in literary form does not provide an argument to identify his approach to the absolute with that of the romantics. |
| author |
Carbó Ribugent, Mònica |
| author_facet |
Carbó Ribugent, Mònica |
| author_sort |
Carbó Ribugent, Mònica |
| title |
Juicio y ser. Kant y Fichte en la encrucijada hacia el romanticismo |
| title_short |
Juicio y ser. Kant y Fichte en la encrucijada hacia el romanticismo |
| title_full |
Juicio y ser. Kant y Fichte en la encrucijada hacia el romanticismo |
| title_fullStr |
Juicio y ser. Kant y Fichte en la encrucijada hacia el romanticismo |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Juicio y ser. Kant y Fichte en la encrucijada hacia el romanticismo |
| title_sort |
juicio y ser. kant y fichte en la encrucijada hacia el romanticismo |
| publisher |
Revista de Estud(i)os sobre Fichte |
| publishDate |
2026 |
| container_title |
URI:https://journals.openedition.org/ref |
| url |
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.4000/ref.425 https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://journals.openedition.org/ref/425 |
| _version_ |
1877291675453227008 |