As diferenças entre Fichte e Schelling referentes à questão do direito

As diferenças entre Fichte e Schelling referentes à questão do direito

The paper explores some problems of the theory of law’s foundation in German idealism, by comparing Schelling’s perspective in his early work of 1796-1797 with Fichte’s perspective in his first treatise on law. Despite of the similarities between the two works, some differences may be shown, which u...

全面介紹

Enregistré dans:
書目詳細資料
發表在:URI:https://journals.openedition.org/ref,
主要作者: Popa, Délia
格式: Article ou chapitre numérique
語言:Portugais
出版: Revista de Estud(i)os sobre Fichte 2026
主題:
autonomy
Fichte
Schelling
law
collective subjectivity
在線閱讀:Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
id openedition-oai:revues.org:ref_392
record_format openedition
spelling openedition-oai:revues.org:ref_392 https://doi.org/10.4000/ref.392 urn:doi:10.4000/ref.392 pt https://journals.openedition.org/ref/392 2026-06-09T02:00:00Z info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess article info:eu-repo/semantics/article urn:handle:20.500.13089/jqc0 All rights reserved As diferenças entre Fichte e Schelling referentes à questão do direito Revista de Estud(i)os sobre Fichte Universidade Federal do Espirito Santo info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2258-014X URI:https://journals.openedition.org/ref Popa, Délia autonomy Fichte Schelling law collective subjectivity The paper explores some problems of the theory of law’s foundation in German idealism, by comparing Schelling’s perspective in his early work of 1796-1797 with Fichte’s perspective in his first treatise on law. Despite of the similarities between the two works, some differences may be shown, which underline young Schelling’s originality. When criticizing, like Fichte, the natural law, Schelling proposes a new theory on the relation between autonomy and law, opening the aria of thinking a collective subjectivity. Analyzing the practical status of an “autonomous heteronomy” in a relation of equality, his treatise marks a major step in thinking the law as a common right.
collection OpenEdition Journal
language Portugais
format Article ou chapitre numérique
building 0/Bibliothèque numérique/
1/Bibliothèque numérique/OpenEdition Journals/
topic autonomy
Fichte
Schelling
law
collective subjectivity
spellingShingle autonomy
Fichte
Schelling
law
collective subjectivity
Popa, Délia
As diferenças entre Fichte e Schelling referentes à questão do direito
description The paper explores some problems of the theory of law’s foundation in German idealism, by comparing Schelling’s perspective in his early work of 1796-1797 with Fichte’s perspective in his first treatise on law. Despite of the similarities between the two works, some differences may be shown, which underline young Schelling’s originality. When criticizing, like Fichte, the natural law, Schelling proposes a new theory on the relation between autonomy and law, opening the aria of thinking a collective subjectivity. Analyzing the practical status of an “autonomous heteronomy” in a relation of equality, his treatise marks a major step in thinking the law as a common right.
author Popa, Délia
author_facet Popa, Délia
author_sort Popa, Délia
title As diferenças entre Fichte e Schelling referentes à questão do direito
title_short As diferenças entre Fichte e Schelling referentes à questão do direito
title_full As diferenças entre Fichte e Schelling referentes à questão do direito
title_fullStr As diferenças entre Fichte e Schelling referentes à questão do direito
title_full_unstemmed As diferenças entre Fichte e Schelling referentes à questão do direito
title_sort as diferenças entre fichte e schelling referentes à questão do direito
publisher Revista de Estud(i)os sobre Fichte
publishDate 2026
container_title URI:https://journals.openedition.org/ref
url https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.4000/ref.392
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://journals.openedition.org/ref/392
_version_ 1877291675438546944

相似書籍