MARC表示: Commentary on Court of Justice of the European Union judgments C-434/15 Of 20 December 2017 (Asociacion Profesional Elite Taxi v Uber Systems Spain SL) and C-320/16 of 10 April 2018 (Uber France SAS)

Commentary on Court of Justice of the European Union judgments C-434/15 Of 20 December 2017 (Asociacion Profesional Elite Taxi v Uber Systems Spain SL) and C-320/16 of 10 April 2018 (Uber France SAS)

In its two decisions on the activity of the company Uber in Spain and France, the CJEU described the company’s activity as a transport service, subject to the general regime of the Directive on services in the internal market and subject to shared competence between the Member States and the Union....

詳細記述

保存先:

書誌詳細
出版年:	URI:https://journals.openedition.org/rdctss,
主要な著者:	Meier, Anne, Pärli, Kurt
フォーマット:	Article ou chapitre numérique
言語:	Anglais
出版事項:	Revue de droit comparé du travail et de la sécurité sociale 2021
主題:	concurrence digitalisation travail de plateforme qualification des services dans l’économie collaborative fonction d’employeur competition platform work qualification of services in the collaborative economy employer’s function
オンライン･アクセス:	Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM

id	openedition-oai:revues.org:rdctss_1421
record_format	openedition
spelling	openedition-oai:revues.org:rdctss_1421 https://doi.org/10.4000/rdctss.1421 urn:doi:10.4000/rdctss.1421 en https://journals.openedition.org/rdctss/1421 2021-11-09T01:00:00Z info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess article info:eu-repo/semantics/article urn:handle:20.500.13089/jjbx https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Commentary on Court of Justice of the European Union judgments C-434/15 Of 20 December 2017 (Asociacion Profesional Elite Taxi v Uber Systems Spain SL) and C-320/16 of 10 April 2018 (Uber France SAS) Revue de droit comparé du travail et de la sécurité sociale Centre de droit comparé du travail et de la sécurité sociale info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2262-9815 info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2117-4350 URI:https://journals.openedition.org/rdctss Meier, Anne Pärli, Kurt concurrence digitalisation travail de plateforme qualification des services dans l’économie collaborative fonction d’employeur competition digitalisation platform work qualification of services in the collaborative economy employer’s function In its two decisions on the activity of the company Uber in Spain and France, the CJEU described the company’s activity as a transport service, subject to the general regime of the Directive on services in the internal market and subject to shared competence between the Member States and the Union. Member States are therefore authorised to regulate this activity by making it subject to authorisation or even by prohibiting it. In our opinion, the functional analysis of Uber’s activity carried out by the CJEU should inspire the reasoning of the national courts, which will be called upon to examine the crucial question in labour law of the nature of the legal relations between Uber and his drivers (employees or independent contractors). Dans ses deux arrêts sur l’activité de l’entreprise Uber en Espagne et en France, la CJUE a qualifié l’activité de l’entreprise de service de transport, soumis au régime général de la Directive relative aux services dans le marché intérieur et faisant l’objet d’une compétence partagée entre les Etats membres et l’Union. Les Etats membres sont donc autorisés à réglementer cette activité en la soumettant à autorisation, voire en l’interdisant. L’analyse fonctionnelle de l’activité d’Uber effectuée par la CJUE devrait à notre avis nourrir le raisonnement des tribunaux nationaux qui seront appelés à se pencher sur la question, cruciale en droit social, de la nature des rapports juridiques entre Uber et ses chauffeurs (contrat de travail ou partenariat avec des indépendants).
collection	OpenEdition Journal
language	Anglais
format	Article ou chapitre numérique
building	0/Bibliothèque numérique/ 1/Bibliothèque numérique/OpenEdition Journals/
topic	concurrence digitalisation travail de plateforme qualification des services dans l’économie collaborative fonction d’employeur competition digitalisation platform work qualification of services in the collaborative economy employer’s function
spellingShingle	concurrence digitalisation travail de plateforme qualification des services dans l’économie collaborative fonction d’employeur competition digitalisation platform work qualification of services in the collaborative economy employer’s function Meier, Anne Pärli, Kurt Commentary on Court of Justice of the European Union judgments C-434/15 Of 20 December 2017 (Asociacion Profesional Elite Taxi v Uber Systems Spain SL) and C-320/16 of 10 April 2018 (Uber France SAS)
description	In its two decisions on the activity of the company Uber in Spain and France, the CJEU described the company’s activity as a transport service, subject to the general regime of the Directive on services in the internal market and subject to shared competence between the Member States and the Union. Member States are therefore authorised to regulate this activity by making it subject to authorisation or even by prohibiting it. In our opinion, the functional analysis of Uber’s activity carried out by the CJEU should inspire the reasoning of the national courts, which will be called upon to examine the crucial question in labour law of the nature of the legal relations between Uber and his drivers (employees or independent contractors).
author	Meier, Anne Pärli, Kurt
author_facet	Meier, Anne Pärli, Kurt
author_sort	Meier, Anne
title	Commentary on Court of Justice of the European Union judgments C-434/15 Of 20 December 2017 (Asociacion Profesional Elite Taxi v Uber Systems Spain SL) and C-320/16 of 10 April 2018 (Uber France SAS)
title_short	Commentary on Court of Justice of the European Union judgments C-434/15 Of 20 December 2017 (Asociacion Profesional Elite Taxi v Uber Systems Spain SL) and C-320/16 of 10 April 2018 (Uber France SAS)
title_full	Commentary on Court of Justice of the European Union judgments C-434/15 Of 20 December 2017 (Asociacion Profesional Elite Taxi v Uber Systems Spain SL) and C-320/16 of 10 April 2018 (Uber France SAS)
title_fullStr	Commentary on Court of Justice of the European Union judgments C-434/15 Of 20 December 2017 (Asociacion Profesional Elite Taxi v Uber Systems Spain SL) and C-320/16 of 10 April 2018 (Uber France SAS)
title_full_unstemmed	Commentary on Court of Justice of the European Union judgments C-434/15 Of 20 December 2017 (Asociacion Profesional Elite Taxi v Uber Systems Spain SL) and C-320/16 of 10 April 2018 (Uber France SAS)
title_sort	commentary on court of justice of the european union judgments c-434/15 of 20 december 2017 (asociacion profesional elite taxi v uber systems spain sl) and c-320/16 of 10 april 2018 (uber france sas)
publisher	Revue de droit comparé du travail et de la sécurité sociale
publishDate	2021
container_title	URI:https://journals.openedition.org/rdctss
url	https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.4000/rdctss.1421 https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://journals.openedition.org/rdctss/1421
_version_	1877293413789859840

Commentary on Court of Justice of the European Union judgments C-434/15 Of 20 December 2017 (Asociacion Profesional Elite Taxi v Uber Systems Spain SL) and C-320/16 of 10 April 2018 (Uber France SAS)

類似資料