Sulle spalle di giganti di sabbia
Credibility in the production and circulation of scientific knowledge is not absolutely guaranteed, but pursued through the adoption of practices that are considered right and good, as emphasised by Merton. Knowledge production has been extensively analysed in terms of various aspects such as replic...
Đã lưu trong:
| Xuất bản năm: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/qds, |
|---|---|
| Tác giả chính: | |
| Định dạng: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Ngôn ngữ: | Italien |
| Được phát hành: |
Quaderni di Sociologia
2025
|
| Truy cập trực tuyến: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| id |
openedition-oai:revues.org:qds_7121 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
openedition |
| spelling |
openedition-oai:revues.org:qds_7121 https://doi.org/10.4000/13k0k urn:doi:10.4000/13k0k it https://journals.openedition.org/qds/7121 2025-03-24T01:00:00Z info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess article info:eu-repo/semantics/article urn:handle:20.500.13089/13k0k https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Sulle spalle di giganti di sabbia Quaderni di Sociologia Rosenberg & Sellier info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2421-5848 info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/0033-4952 URI:https://journals.openedition.org/qds Parra Saiani, Paolo Credibility in the production and circulation of scientific knowledge is not absolutely guaranteed, but pursued through the adoption of practices that are considered right and good, as emphasised by Merton. Knowledge production has been extensively analysed in terms of various aspects such as replicability, transparency of procedures and methodological correctness. However, less attention has been paid to the circulation of knowledge and the role of peer review in this process. The peer review process, which involves the judgement of external experts on the authenticity of a scientific article, is crucial for the credibility and reputation of published research: it not only filters knowledge but also legitimises it, helping to establish a boundary between science and non-science, as many have pointed out. Today, however, the peer review system is being challenged by two main phenomena: the introduction of quantitative evaluation criteria and the rise of new publishing groups with aggressive commercial practices are affecting the number of scientific publications, thus altering the balance that has historically ensured the credibility and quality of research. |
| collection |
OpenEdition Journal |
| language |
Italien |
| format |
Article ou chapitre numérique |
| building |
0/Bibliothèque numérique/ 1/Bibliothèque numérique/OpenEdition Journals/ |
| description |
Credibility in the production and circulation of scientific knowledge is not absolutely guaranteed, but pursued through the adoption of practices that are considered right and good, as emphasised by Merton. Knowledge production has been extensively analysed in terms of various aspects such as replicability, transparency of procedures and methodological correctness. However, less attention has been paid to the circulation of knowledge and the role of peer review in this process. The peer review process, which involves the judgement of external experts on the authenticity of a scientific article, is crucial for the credibility and reputation of published research: it not only filters knowledge but also legitimises it, helping to establish a boundary between science and non-science, as many have pointed out. Today, however, the peer review system is being challenged by two main phenomena: the introduction of quantitative evaluation criteria and the rise of new publishing groups with aggressive commercial practices are affecting the number of scientific publications, thus altering the balance that has historically ensured the credibility and quality of research. |
| author |
Parra Saiani, Paolo |
| spellingShingle |
Parra Saiani, Paolo Sulle spalle di giganti di sabbia |
| author_facet |
Parra Saiani, Paolo |
| author_sort |
Parra Saiani, Paolo |
| title |
Sulle spalle di giganti di sabbia |
| title_short |
Sulle spalle di giganti di sabbia |
| title_full |
Sulle spalle di giganti di sabbia |
| title_fullStr |
Sulle spalle di giganti di sabbia |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Sulle spalle di giganti di sabbia |
| title_sort |
sulle spalle di giganti di sabbia |
| publisher |
Quaderni di Sociologia |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| container_title |
URI:https://journals.openedition.org/qds |
| url |
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.4000/13k0k https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://journals.openedition.org/qds/7121 |
| _version_ |
1877292099461709824 |