Confusion, Chaos, and Conflict in U.S. Law and Health Care after Dobbs
The U.S. Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision caused a proliferation of contradictory state laws and judicial decisions that are producing confusion for health care providers, which in turn limits access to care for all patients of reproductive age. This paper documents the rapidly changing legal landscap...
Enregistré dans:
| Dans: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/ilcea, |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Format: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Publié: |
ILCEA
2024
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| id |
openedition-oai:revues.org:ilcea_20060 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
openedition |
| spelling |
openedition-oai:revues.org:ilcea_20060 https://doi.org/10.4000/11pre urn:doi:10.4000/11pre en https://journals.openedition.org/ilcea/20060 2024-05-23T02:00:00Z info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess article info:eu-repo/semantics/article urn:handle:20.500.13089/11pre https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ Confusion, Chaos, and Conflict in U.S. Law and Health Care after Dobbs ILCEA UGA Éditions - Université Grenoble Alpes info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2101-0609 info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/1639-6073 URI:https://journals.openedition.org/ilcea Huberfeld, Nicole avortement Roe Casey Dobbs droits reproductifs soins de santé fédéralisme droit constitutionnel abortion Roe Casey Dobbs reproductive rights health care federalism constitutional law The U.S. Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision caused a proliferation of contradictory state laws and judicial decisions that are producing confusion for health care providers, which in turn limits access to care for all patients of reproductive age. This paper documents the rapidly changing legal landscape to investigate and contextualize the significance of these inter‑state conflicts and illustrate how inequities deepen when health care is left in the hands of state governments without national law to provide guardrails. Drawing on interdisciplinary scholarship, including legal, medical, and public health research, this essay considers how traditional federalism theory, which encourages sub‑government variation, does not provide clear solutions to state law barriers to inter-state cooperation within a federal union, which has been essential to regulating health care in the U.S. L’arrêt Dobbs de la Cour suprême des États‑Unis a entraîné une prolifération de lois étatiques et de décisions judiciaires contradictoires qui sèment la confusion chez les prestataires de soins de santé, ce qui limite l’accès aux soins pour tous les patients en âge de procréer. Cet article documente l’évolution rapide du paysage juridique afin d’étudier et de contextualiser l’importance de ces conflits interétatiques et d’illustrer comment les inégalités s’aggravent lorsque les soins de santé sont laissés aux mains des gouvernements des États sans que la législation nationale ne serve de garde‑fou. S’appuyant sur une recherche interdisciplinaire, notamment dans les domaines du droit, de la médecine et de la santé publique, cet article examine comment la théorie traditionnelle du fédéralisme, qui encourage la variation sous‑gouvernementale, n’apporte pas de solutions claires aux obstacles que pose le droit des États à la coopération interétatique au sein d’une union fédérale, qui a été essentielle pour réglementer les soins de santé aux États‑Unis. |
| collection |
OpenEdition Journal |
| language |
Anglais |
| format |
Article ou chapitre numérique |
| building |
0/Bibliothèque numérique/ 1/Bibliothèque numérique/OpenEdition Journals/ |
| topic |
avortement Roe Casey Dobbs droits reproductifs soins de santé fédéralisme droit constitutionnel abortion Roe Casey Dobbs reproductive rights health care federalism constitutional law |
| spellingShingle |
avortement Roe Casey Dobbs droits reproductifs soins de santé fédéralisme droit constitutionnel abortion Roe Casey Dobbs reproductive rights health care federalism constitutional law Huberfeld, Nicole Confusion, Chaos, and Conflict in U.S. Law and Health Care after Dobbs |
| description |
The U.S. Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision caused a proliferation of contradictory state laws and judicial decisions that are producing confusion for health care providers, which in turn limits access to care for all patients of reproductive age. This paper documents the rapidly changing legal landscape to investigate and contextualize the significance of these inter‑state conflicts and illustrate how inequities deepen when health care is left in the hands of state governments without national law to provide guardrails. Drawing on interdisciplinary scholarship, including legal, medical, and public health research, this essay considers how traditional federalism theory, which encourages sub‑government variation, does not provide clear solutions to state law barriers to inter-state cooperation within a federal union, which has been essential to regulating health care in the U.S. |
| author |
Huberfeld, Nicole |
| author_facet |
Huberfeld, Nicole |
| author_sort |
Huberfeld, Nicole |
| title |
Confusion, Chaos, and Conflict in U.S. Law and Health Care after Dobbs |
| title_short |
Confusion, Chaos, and Conflict in U.S. Law and Health Care after Dobbs |
| title_full |
Confusion, Chaos, and Conflict in U.S. Law and Health Care after Dobbs |
| title_fullStr |
Confusion, Chaos, and Conflict in U.S. Law and Health Care after Dobbs |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Confusion, Chaos, and Conflict in U.S. Law and Health Care after Dobbs |
| title_sort |
confusion, chaos, and conflict in u.s. law and health care after dobbs |
| publisher |
ILCEA |
| publishDate |
2024 |
| container_title |
URI:https://journals.openedition.org/ilcea |
| url |
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.4000/11pre https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://journals.openedition.org/ilcea/20060 |
| _version_ |
1877292429786218496 |