Toward Truthlikeness in Historiography

Truthlikeness in historiography would allow us to be optimistic fallible realists about historiography – to hold that historical knowledge is about the past, true albeit fallible, and can increase over time. In this paper, three desiderata for a concept of truthlikeness in historiography will be out...

Ful tanımlama

Kaydedildi:
Detaylı Bibliyografya
Yayımlandı:URI:https://journals.openedition.org/ejpap,
Yazar: Laas, Oliver
Materyal Türü: Article ou chapitre numérique
Dil:Anglais
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 2017
Online Erişim:Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
id openedition-oai:revues.org:ejpap_643
record_format openedition
spelling openedition-oai:revues.org:ejpap_643 https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.643 urn:doi:10.4000/ejpap.643 en https://journals.openedition.org/ejpap/643 2017-03-08T01:00:00Z info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess article info:eu-repo/semantics/article urn:handle:20.500.13089/fn4q https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Toward Truthlikeness in Historiography European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy Associazione Pragma info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2036-4091 URI:https://journals.openedition.org/ejpap Laas, Oliver Truthlikeness in historiography would allow us to be optimistic fallible realists about historiography – to hold that historical knowledge is about the past, true albeit fallible, and can increase over time. In this paper, three desiderata for a concept of truthlikeness in historiography will be outlined. One of the main challenges for truthlikeness is historiographic skepticism which holds that historiography is indistinguishable from fiction and cannot therefore furnish us with true knowledge about the past. Such skepticism rests on the postmodern challenge, which will be criticized on the grounds that it rests on an implausible theory of meaning. It will be shown that Peirce’s semeiotic and pragmatist theory of truth, interpreted dialogically or game-theoretically, provides a suitable framework within which to pursue the project of defining a concept of truthlikeness for historiography. Finally, directions for possible future research into truthlikeness in historiography, including ways of defining a measure of truthlikeness, will be considered.
collection OpenEdition Journal
language Anglais
format Article ou chapitre numérique
building 0/Bibliothèque numérique/
1/Bibliothèque numérique/OpenEdition Journals/
description Truthlikeness in historiography would allow us to be optimistic fallible realists about historiography – to hold that historical knowledge is about the past, true albeit fallible, and can increase over time. In this paper, three desiderata for a concept of truthlikeness in historiography will be outlined. One of the main challenges for truthlikeness is historiographic skepticism which holds that historiography is indistinguishable from fiction and cannot therefore furnish us with true knowledge about the past. Such skepticism rests on the postmodern challenge, which will be criticized on the grounds that it rests on an implausible theory of meaning. It will be shown that Peirce’s semeiotic and pragmatist theory of truth, interpreted dialogically or game-theoretically, provides a suitable framework within which to pursue the project of defining a concept of truthlikeness for historiography. Finally, directions for possible future research into truthlikeness in historiography, including ways of defining a measure of truthlikeness, will be considered.
author Laas, Oliver
spellingShingle Laas, Oliver
Toward Truthlikeness in Historiography
author_facet Laas, Oliver
author_sort Laas, Oliver
title Toward Truthlikeness in Historiography
title_short Toward Truthlikeness in Historiography
title_full Toward Truthlikeness in Historiography
title_fullStr Toward Truthlikeness in Historiography
title_full_unstemmed Toward Truthlikeness in Historiography
title_sort toward truthlikeness in historiography
publisher European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy
publishDate 2017
container_title URI:https://journals.openedition.org/ejpap
url https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.643
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://journals.openedition.org/ejpap/643
_version_ 1877242350572404736