China Dealing with the Impact of Fake News : Roles of Governments in the “Post-truth” Predicament
With the advancement of communication technology and increasing number of people turning to their mobile devices for news and information, social media is functioning as both the platform as well as content provider. However, fake news could also travel faster and wider, while the traditional gateke...
Đã lưu trong:
| Xuất bản năm: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/ctd, |
|---|---|
| Những tác giả chính: | , , |
| Định dạng: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Ngôn ngữ: | Anglais |
| Được phát hành: |
Communication, technologies et développement
2021
|
| Những chủ đề: | |
| Truy cập trực tuyến: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| id |
openedition-oai:revues.org:ctd_5960 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
openedition |
| spelling |
openedition-oai:revues.org:ctd_5960 https://doi.org/10.4000/ctd.5960 urn:doi:10.4000/ctd.5960 en https://journals.openedition.org/ctd/5960 2021-05-25T02:00:00Z info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess article info:eu-repo/semantics/article urn:handle:20.500.13089/eyzk https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ China Dealing with the Impact of Fake News : Roles of Governments in the “Post-truth” Predicament Communication, technologies et développement Chaire Unesco Pratiques émergentes en technologies et communication pour le développement info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2491-1437 URI:https://journals.openedition.org/ctd Yang, Yu Kuo, Huang author), Jiang Fei (corresponding sphère publique "Post-vérité" fake news rôle du gouvernement production de connaissances. public sphere “Post-truth” fake news government role knowledge production "Post-verità" fake news ruolo del governo sfera pubblica produzione di conoscenza With the advancement of communication technology and increasing number of people turning to their mobile devices for news and information, social media is functioning as both the platform as well as content provider. However, fake news could also travel faster and wider, while the traditional gatekeeping process of media diminishes. In the context of the Brexit referendum and the U.S. presidential campaign in 2016, the spike of “post-truth” in the headlines spurred heated discussions of the tension between “appeals to emotion” and “objective facts”. Based on a review of anti-fake news measures, case analysis, and expert consultations, this study examined the government’s roles from three dimensions, as public sphere guarantor, constrained moderation provider and knowledge production facilitator in the efforts to create a news ecosystem that values and promotes truth. Avec le progrès des technologies de la communication et le nombre croissant de personnes qui se tournent vers leurs appareils mobiles pour obtenir des actualités et des informations, les médias sociaux servent à la fois de plateforme et de fournisseur de contenu. Cependant, les intox (ou fakes news ) peuvent aussi circuler plus rapidement et plus largement, tandis que le processus traditionnel de contrôle des médias diminue. Dans le contexte du référendum sur le Brexit et de la campagne présidentielle américaine de 2016, le pic de "post-vérité" dans les gros titres a suscité des discussions animées sur la tension entre les "appels à l'émotion" et les "faits objectifs". Sur la base d'un examen des mesures anti-fake news, d'une analyse de cas et de consultations d'experts, cette étude a examiné les rôles du gouvernement sous trois dimensions, en tant que garant de la sphère publique, fournisseur de modération sous contrainte et facilitateur de la production de connaissances dans les efforts visant à créer un écosystème de nouvelles qui valorise et promeut la vérité. Con l'avanzamento della tecnologia della comunicazione e il crescente numero di persone che si rivolgono ai loro dispositivi mobili per notizie e informazioni, i social media stanno funzionando sia come piattaforma che come fornitore di contenuti. Tuttavia, le fake news potrebbero anche viaggiare più velocemente e più ampiamente, mentre il tradizionale processo di gatekeeping dei media diminuisce. Nel contesto del referendum sulla Brexit e della campagna presidenziale statunitense nel 2016, il picco di "post-verità" nei titoli dei giornali ha stimolato accese discussioni sulla tensione tra "appelli alle emozioni" e "fatti oggettivi". Sulla base di una revisione delle misure anti-fake news, dell'analisi dei casi e delle consultazioni di esperti, questo studio ha esaminato i ruoli del governo da tre dimensioni, come garante della sfera pubblica, fornitore di moderazione vincolata e facilitatore della produzione di conoscenza negli sforzi per creare un ecosistema di notizie che valorizza e promuove la verità. |
| collection |
OpenEdition Journal |
| language |
Anglais |
| format |
Article ou chapitre numérique |
| building |
0/Bibliothèque numérique/ 1/Bibliothèque numérique/OpenEdition Journals/ |
| topic |
sphère publique "Post-vérité" fake news rôle du gouvernement production de connaissances. public sphere “Post-truth” fake news government role knowledge production "Post-verità" fake news ruolo del governo sfera pubblica produzione di conoscenza |
| spellingShingle |
sphère publique "Post-vérité" fake news rôle du gouvernement production de connaissances. public sphere “Post-truth” fake news government role knowledge production "Post-verità" fake news ruolo del governo sfera pubblica produzione di conoscenza Yang, Yu Kuo, Huang author), Jiang Fei (corresponding China Dealing with the Impact of Fake News : Roles of Governments in the “Post-truth” Predicament |
| description |
With the advancement of communication technology and increasing number of people turning to their mobile devices for news and information, social media is functioning as both the platform as well as content provider. However, fake news could also travel faster and wider, while the traditional gatekeeping process of media diminishes. In the context of the Brexit referendum and the U.S. presidential campaign in 2016, the spike of “post-truth” in the headlines spurred heated discussions of the tension between “appeals to emotion” and “objective facts”. Based on a review of anti-fake news measures, case analysis, and expert consultations, this study examined the government’s roles from three dimensions, as public sphere guarantor, constrained moderation provider and knowledge production facilitator in the efforts to create a news ecosystem that values and promotes truth. |
| author |
Yang, Yu Kuo, Huang author), Jiang Fei (corresponding |
| author_facet |
Yang, Yu Kuo, Huang author), Jiang Fei (corresponding |
| author_sort |
Yang, Yu |
| title |
China Dealing with the Impact of Fake News : Roles of Governments in the “Post-truth” Predicament |
| title_short |
China Dealing with the Impact of Fake News : Roles of Governments in the “Post-truth” Predicament |
| title_full |
China Dealing with the Impact of Fake News : Roles of Governments in the “Post-truth” Predicament |
| title_fullStr |
China Dealing with the Impact of Fake News : Roles of Governments in the “Post-truth” Predicament |
| title_full_unstemmed |
China Dealing with the Impact of Fake News : Roles of Governments in the “Post-truth” Predicament |
| title_sort |
china dealing with the impact of fake news : roles of governments in the “post-truth” predicament |
| publisher |
Communication, technologies et développement |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| container_title |
URI:https://journals.openedition.org/ctd |
| url |
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.4000/ctd.5960 https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://journals.openedition.org/ctd/5960 |
| _version_ |
1877293597519249408 |