Methodological changes and challenges in the measurement of freedom of information. An analysis of the Reporters Without Borders and Freedom House indexes

The article analyses the main methodological challenges of the two most important indicators in measuring freedom of the press around the world. Freedom House (FH) and Reporters Without Borders (RWB) have become references for studies that go beyond freedom of the press and their importance forces u...

Täydet tiedot

Tallennettuna:
Bibliografiset tiedot
Julkaisussa:URI:https://journals.openedition.org/cs,
Päätekijät: Frutos, Ruth de, Giannone, Diego
Aineistotyyppi: Article ou chapitre numérique
Kieli:Anglais
Julkaistu: Comunicação e sociedade 2019
Aiheet:
Linkit:Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
id openedition-oai:revues.org:cs_368
record_format openedition
spelling openedition-oai:revues.org:cs_368 en https://journals.openedition.org/cs/368 2019-10-01T02:00:00Z info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess article info:eu-repo/semantics/article urn:handle:20.500.13089/eyky https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Methodological changes and challenges in the measurement of freedom of information. An analysis of the Reporters Without Borders and Freedom House indexes Comunicação e sociedade Centro de estudos de comunicação e sociedade info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2183-3575 info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/1645-2089 URI:https://journals.openedition.org/cs Frutos, Ruth de Giannone, Diego methodology indicators freedom of information Freedom House Reporters Without Borders metodologia indicadores liberdade de imprensa Freedom House Repórteres Sem Fronteiras The article analyses the main methodological challenges of the two most important indicators in measuring freedom of the press around the world. Freedom House (FH) and Reporters Without Borders (RWB) have become references for studies that go beyond freedom of the press and their importance forces us to analyze what the methodological aspects are that determined these methodologies and which are omitted. The results of this study make it possible to determine that the indicators of Reporters Without Borders and Freedom House present serious methodological deficiencies that, although they have tried to correct, continue to be the source of numerous controversies, such as the absence of mechanisms to protect journalists in their measurement instruments. O artigo analisa os principais desafios metodológicos colocados pelos dois indicadores mais importantes para medir a liberdade de imprensa no mundo. Freedom House (FH) e Repórteres Sem Fronteiras (RSF) tornaram-se referência para estudos que vão além da liberdade de imprensa, e sua importância nos obriga a analisar os aspetos metodológicos que determinam essas metodologias e que são omitidos. Os resultados deste estudo, ao analisar-se a avaliação dos países latino-americanos nos índices RSF e FH, nos permitem determinar que esses instrumentos apresentam graves deficiências metodológicas que, embora se tenham tentado corrigir, continuam a ser fonte de inúmeras controvérsias, como a ausência de mecanismos de proteção dos jornalistas em seus instrumentos de medição.
collection OpenEdition Journal
language Anglais
format Article ou chapitre numérique
building 0/Bibliothèque numérique/
1/Bibliothèque numérique/OpenEdition Journals/
topic methodology
indicators
freedom of information
Freedom House
Reporters Without Borders
metodologia
indicadores
liberdade de imprensa
Freedom House
Repórteres Sem Fronteiras
spellingShingle methodology
indicators
freedom of information
Freedom House
Reporters Without Borders
metodologia
indicadores
liberdade de imprensa
Freedom House
Repórteres Sem Fronteiras
Frutos, Ruth de
Giannone, Diego
Methodological changes and challenges in the measurement of freedom of information. An analysis of the Reporters Without Borders and Freedom House indexes
description The article analyses the main methodological challenges of the two most important indicators in measuring freedom of the press around the world. Freedom House (FH) and Reporters Without Borders (RWB) have become references for studies that go beyond freedom of the press and their importance forces us to analyze what the methodological aspects are that determined these methodologies and which are omitted. The results of this study make it possible to determine that the indicators of Reporters Without Borders and Freedom House present serious methodological deficiencies that, although they have tried to correct, continue to be the source of numerous controversies, such as the absence of mechanisms to protect journalists in their measurement instruments.
author Frutos, Ruth de
Giannone, Diego
author_facet Frutos, Ruth de
Giannone, Diego
author_sort Frutos, Ruth de
title Methodological changes and challenges in the measurement of freedom of information. An analysis of the Reporters Without Borders and Freedom House indexes
title_short Methodological changes and challenges in the measurement of freedom of information. An analysis of the Reporters Without Borders and Freedom House indexes
title_full Methodological changes and challenges in the measurement of freedom of information. An analysis of the Reporters Without Borders and Freedom House indexes
title_fullStr Methodological changes and challenges in the measurement of freedom of information. An analysis of the Reporters Without Borders and Freedom House indexes
title_full_unstemmed Methodological changes and challenges in the measurement of freedom of information. An analysis of the Reporters Without Borders and Freedom House indexes
title_sort methodological changes and challenges in the measurement of freedom of information. an analysis of the reporters without borders and freedom house indexes
publisher Comunicação e sociedade
publishDate 2019
container_title URI:https://journals.openedition.org/cs
url https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://journals.openedition.org/cs/368
_version_ 1877241476489936896