স্টাফেদের বিবরণ দেখুন: Rescuing participation: a critique on the dark participation concept

Rescuing participation: a critique on the dark participation concept

This article returns to the in-depth theorisations about participation in order to reflect about the nature of participation, and to demonstrate some of the problems inherent to the publications that distinguish between light and dark (forms of) participation. The starting point of the article is a...

সম্পূর্ণ বিবরণ

সংরক্ষণ করুন:

গ্রন্থ-পঞ্জীর বিবরন
প্রকাশিত:	URI:https://journals.openedition.org/cs,
প্রধান লেখক:	Carpentier, Nico, Melo, Ana Duarte, Ribeiro, Fábio
বিন্যাস:	Article ou chapitre numérique
ভাষা:	Anglais
প্রকাশিত:	Comunicação e sociedade 2020
বিষয়গুলি:	condições de possibilidade definição de participação cultura democrática limites de participação teoria participativa relevância da participação conditions of possibility defining participation democratic culture limits of participation participatory theory relevance of participation
অনলাইন ব্যবহার করুন:	Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM

id	openedition-oai:revues.org:cs_1284
record_format	openedition
spelling	openedition-oai:revues.org:cs_1284 en https://journals.openedition.org/cs/1284 2020-04-08T02:00:00Z info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess article info:eu-repo/semantics/article urn:handle:20.500.13089/eymq https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Rescuing participation: a critique on the dark participation concept Comunicação e sociedade Centro de estudos de comunicação e sociedade info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2183-3575 info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/1645-2089 URI:https://journals.openedition.org/cs Carpentier, Nico Melo, Ana Duarte Ribeiro, Fábio condições de possibilidade definição de participação cultura democrática limites de participação teoria participativa relevância da participação conditions of possibility defining participation democratic culture limits of participation participatory theory relevance of participation This article returns to the in-depth theorisations about participation in order to reflect about the nature of participation, and to demonstrate some of the problems inherent to the publications that distinguish between light and dark (forms of) participation. The starting point of the article is a discussion on three limits embedded in the concept of participation. The first limit brings us back to the old discussion on the nature of participation, the focus on power, and what is included and excluded through its definition(s). The second limit of the participation concept thematises a series of distinctions, namely those between participation, its condition of possibility (access and interaction) and its outcomes. The third limit that (potentially) structures participation is the limit imposed by democratic culture. In response to these debates, the article introduces a more positive approach, that focuses on what has been ignored for too long, namely the reasons why participation matters. Here, the article provides a structural reflection on the contributions to the “Rescuing Participation” special issue, and constructs a theoretical model that consists out of three logics, namely a social, political and fantasmagoric logic, allowing us to better understand why participation matters. Este artigo regressa a uma teorização aprofundada sobre o conceito de participação, com o objetivo de refletir sobre a natureza da participação e demonstrar alguns dos problemas inerentes às publicações que distinguem entre formas de participação claras e escuras. O ponto de partida do artigo é uma discussão sobre três limites inscritos no conceito de participação. O primeiro limite leva-nos a uma discussão antiga sobre a natureza da participação, o foco no poder e o que é incluído e excluído nestas definições. O segundo limite do conceito de participação tem como tema uma série de distinções, nomeadamente aquelas entre participação, a sua condição de possibilidade (acesso e interação) e os seus resultados. O terceiro limite que (potencialmente) estrutura a participação é da imposição da cultura democrática. Em resposta a estes debates, o artigo apresenta uma abordagem mais positiva, focada no que foi ignorado por muito tempo, a saber, as razões pelas quais a participação é importante. Aqui, o artigo fornece uma reflexão estrutural sobre as contribuições para este número da revista e constrói um modelo teórico que consiste em associar estas três lógicas, a saber, uma lógica social, política e fantasmagórica, permitindo entender melhor as razões pelas quais a participação é importante.
collection	OpenEdition Journal
language	Anglais
format	Article ou chapitre numérique
building	0/Bibliothèque numérique/ 1/Bibliothèque numérique/OpenEdition Journals/
topic	condições de possibilidade definição de participação cultura democrática limites de participação teoria participativa relevância da participação conditions of possibility defining participation democratic culture limits of participation participatory theory relevance of participation
spellingShingle	condições de possibilidade definição de participação cultura democrática limites de participação teoria participativa relevância da participação conditions of possibility defining participation democratic culture limits of participation participatory theory relevance of participation Carpentier, Nico Melo, Ana Duarte Ribeiro, Fábio Rescuing participation: a critique on the dark participation concept
description	This article returns to the in-depth theorisations about participation in order to reflect about the nature of participation, and to demonstrate some of the problems inherent to the publications that distinguish between light and dark (forms of) participation. The starting point of the article is a discussion on three limits embedded in the concept of participation. The first limit brings us back to the old discussion on the nature of participation, the focus on power, and what is included and excluded through its definition(s). The second limit of the participation concept thematises a series of distinctions, namely those between participation, its condition of possibility (access and interaction) and its outcomes. The third limit that (potentially) structures participation is the limit imposed by democratic culture. In response to these debates, the article introduces a more positive approach, that focuses on what has been ignored for too long, namely the reasons why participation matters. Here, the article provides a structural reflection on the contributions to the “Rescuing Participation” special issue, and constructs a theoretical model that consists out of three logics, namely a social, political and fantasmagoric logic, allowing us to better understand why participation matters.
author	Carpentier, Nico Melo, Ana Duarte Ribeiro, Fábio
author_facet	Carpentier, Nico Melo, Ana Duarte Ribeiro, Fábio
author_sort	Carpentier, Nico
title	Rescuing participation: a critique on the dark participation concept
title_short	Rescuing participation: a critique on the dark participation concept
title_full	Rescuing participation: a critique on the dark participation concept
title_fullStr	Rescuing participation: a critique on the dark participation concept
title_full_unstemmed	Rescuing participation: a critique on the dark participation concept
title_sort	rescuing participation: a critique on the dark participation concept
publisher	Comunicação e sociedade
publishDate	2020
container_title	URI:https://journals.openedition.org/cs
url	https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://journals.openedition.org/cs/1284
_version_	1877294053435899905

Rescuing participation: a critique on the dark participation concept

অনুরূপ উপাদানগুলি