La « socio-anthropologie » : champ, paradigme ou discipline ?
“Social Anthropology” – Field, Paradigm or Discipline? Particular views about prolonged or observational interviews: This article attempts to describe the methodological aspects of what is called « socio-anthropological » research. It describes the process of “rapprochement” between observation and...
Saved in:
| In: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/bms, |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Language: | Français |
| Published: |
Bulletin de méthodologie sociologique
2008
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| id |
openedition-oai:revues.org:bms_869 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
openedition |
| spelling |
openedition-oai:revues.org:bms_869 fr https://journals.openedition.org/bms/869 2008-06-04T02:00:00Z info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess article info:eu-repo/semantics/article urn:handle:20.500.13089/dax1 All rights reserved La « socio-anthropologie » : champ, paradigme ou discipline ? Bulletin de méthodologie sociologique Association internationale de méthodologie sociologique info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2070-2779 info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/0759-1063 URI:https://journals.openedition.org/bms Juan, Salvador Interviews Over Long Periods of Time Observational Interviews Socio-Anthropology Entretiens de longue durée Entretiens d’observation Socio-anthropologie “Social Anthropology” – Field, Paradigm or Discipline? Particular views about prolonged or observational interviews: This article attempts to describe the methodological aspects of what is called « socio-anthropological » research. It describes the process of “rapprochement” between observation and interviewing in certain research protocols in the context of contemporary societies, particularly in the case of in-depth interviews : interviews over a long period of time with the same person. Comparing the diachronic and synchronic approches of these studies with extended interviews, as presented in several recents books, we can say that the distinction betwen qualitative sociology and anthropology in modern research fields loses its relevance. The consequence of this sociological and anthropological overlap is the creation of a new field of human sciences, and perhaps a new paradigm or discipline. Cet article tente de décrire les aspects méthodologiques des recherches dites « socio-anthropologiques ». Il montre le processus de rapprochement de l’observation et de l’entretien, pratiqué par certains protocoles de recherche dans le contexte des sociétés contemporaines, notamment avec les entretiens très approfondis : des entretiens prolongés par des rencontres répétées avec la même personne. En comparant les approches diachroniques et synchroniques de ces études par entretiens prolongés dans différents ouvrages récents, on peut dire que la distinction entre la sociologie qualitative et l’anthropologie étudiant des champs modernes perd sa pertinence. La conséquences du recouvrement de la sociologie et de l’anthropologie est la création d’un nouveau champ pour les sciences humaines, peut-être d’un nouveau paradigme ou d’une nouvelle discipline. |
| collection |
OpenEdition Journal |
| language |
Français |
| format |
Article ou chapitre numérique |
| building |
0/Bibliothèque numérique/ 1/Bibliothèque numérique/OpenEdition Journals/ |
| topic |
Interviews Over Long Periods of Time Observational Interviews Socio-Anthropology Entretiens de longue durée Entretiens d’observation Socio-anthropologie |
| spellingShingle |
Interviews Over Long Periods of Time Observational Interviews Socio-Anthropology Entretiens de longue durée Entretiens d’observation Socio-anthropologie Juan, Salvador La « socio-anthropologie » : champ, paradigme ou discipline ? |
| description |
“Social Anthropology” – Field, Paradigm or Discipline? Particular views about prolonged or observational interviews: This article attempts to describe the methodological aspects of what is called « socio-anthropological » research. It describes the process of “rapprochement” between observation and interviewing in certain research protocols in the context of contemporary societies, particularly in the case of in-depth interviews : interviews over a long period of time with the same person. Comparing the diachronic and synchronic approches of these studies with extended interviews, as presented in several recents books, we can say that the distinction betwen qualitative sociology and anthropology in modern research fields loses its relevance. The consequence of this sociological and anthropological overlap is the creation of a new field of human sciences, and perhaps a new paradigm or discipline. |
| author |
Juan, Salvador |
| author_facet |
Juan, Salvador |
| author_sort |
Juan, Salvador |
| title |
La « socio-anthropologie » : champ, paradigme ou discipline ? |
| title_short |
La « socio-anthropologie » : champ, paradigme ou discipline ? |
| title_full |
La « socio-anthropologie » : champ, paradigme ou discipline ? |
| title_fullStr |
La « socio-anthropologie » : champ, paradigme ou discipline ? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
La « socio-anthropologie » : champ, paradigme ou discipline ? |
| title_sort |
la « socio-anthropologie » : champ, paradigme ou discipline ? |
| publisher |
Bulletin de méthodologie sociologique |
| publishDate |
2008 |
| container_title |
URI:https://journals.openedition.org/bms |
| url |
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://journals.openedition.org/bms/869 |
| _version_ |
1877244534425911296 |