From Archive to Office: the Role of History in Theories of Architecture Practice
In the forty years since “practice theory” emerged within cultural anthropology, views of architecture have expanded to include a wider entanglement of actors, materials, and societal forces, rather merely individual architects and their resulting buildings. However, recent investigations of archite...
Kaydedildi:
| Yayımlandı: | URI:https://journals.openedition.org/ardeth, |
|---|---|
| Yazar: | |
| Materyal Türü: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Dil: | Anglais |
| Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: |
Ardeth
2020
|
| Konular: | |
| Online Erişim: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| id |
openedition-oai:revues.org:ardeth_744 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
openedition |
| spelling |
openedition-oai:revues.org:ardeth_744 en https://journals.openedition.org/ardeth/744 2020-11-13T01:00:00Z info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess article info:eu-repo/semantics/article urn:handle:20.500.13089/a2at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ From Archive to Office: the Role of History in Theories of Architecture Practice Ardeth Rosenberg & Sellier info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2611-934X info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2532-6457 URI:https://journals.openedition.org/ardeth Cayer, Aaron ethnography practice theory history cultural anthropology STS etnografia teoria della pratica storia antropologia culturale STS In the forty years since “practice theory” emerged within cultural anthropology, views of architecture have expanded to include a wider entanglement of actors, materials, and societal forces, rather merely individual architects and their resulting buildings. However, recent investigations of architectural practice by both historians and anthropologists reveal an emerging schism in theories and methods of analysis – between historical studies of the past and ethnographic studies of the present. This article traces the formation of “practice theory” as it emerged within cultural anthropology as an explicit theory of history during the 1970s and 1980s, and it examines the ways in which history has since been embraced or resisted within studies of architecture practice, including those informed by science and technology studies, cultural anthropology, and architectural history. Sensitive to epistemological frictions and disciplinary allegiances, this article reveals methodological intersections between these approaches that may serve as a common discursive ground upon which to connect the past to the present, the archive to the office, or the discipline to the profession. |
| collection |
OpenEdition Journal |
| language |
Anglais |
| format |
Article ou chapitre numérique |
| building |
0/Bibliothèque numérique/ 1/Bibliothèque numérique/OpenEdition Journals/ |
| topic |
ethnography practice theory history cultural anthropology STS etnografia teoria della pratica storia antropologia culturale STS |
| spellingShingle |
ethnography practice theory history cultural anthropology STS etnografia teoria della pratica storia antropologia culturale STS Cayer, Aaron From Archive to Office: the Role of History in Theories of Architecture Practice |
| description |
In the forty years since “practice theory” emerged within cultural anthropology, views of architecture have expanded to include a wider entanglement of actors, materials, and societal forces, rather merely individual architects and their resulting buildings. However, recent investigations of architectural practice by both historians and anthropologists reveal an emerging schism in theories and methods of analysis – between historical studies of the past and ethnographic studies of the present. This article traces the formation of “practice theory” as it emerged within cultural anthropology as an explicit theory of history during the 1970s and 1980s, and it examines the ways in which history has since been embraced or resisted within studies of architecture practice, including those informed by science and technology studies, cultural anthropology, and architectural history. Sensitive to epistemological frictions and disciplinary allegiances, this article reveals methodological intersections between these approaches that may serve as a common discursive ground upon which to connect the past to the present, the archive to the office, or the discipline to the profession. |
| author |
Cayer, Aaron |
| author_facet |
Cayer, Aaron |
| author_sort |
Cayer, Aaron |
| title |
From Archive to Office: the Role of History in Theories of Architecture Practice |
| title_short |
From Archive to Office: the Role of History in Theories of Architecture Practice |
| title_full |
From Archive to Office: the Role of History in Theories of Architecture Practice |
| title_fullStr |
From Archive to Office: the Role of History in Theories of Architecture Practice |
| title_full_unstemmed |
From Archive to Office: the Role of History in Theories of Architecture Practice |
| title_sort |
from archive to office: the role of history in theories of architecture practice |
| publisher |
Ardeth |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| container_title |
URI:https://journals.openedition.org/ardeth |
| url |
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://journals.openedition.org/ardeth/744 |
| _version_ |
1877293832747352064 |