Palu’e Ikat: Nomenclature and Iconography

This paper provides a comprehensive documentation of customary Palu’e ikat textiles and investigates the extent to which the design nomenclature and local interpretations constitute an iconography. A multivalent approach is used, starting from linguistic-ethnographic fieldwork and engaging criticall...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:URI:https://journals.openedition.org/archipel,
Autores principales: Danerek , Stefan, Danerek , Magnus
Formato: Article ou chapitre numérique
Lenguaje:Anglais
Publicado: Archipel 2020
Acceso en línea:Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
id openedition-oai:revues.org:archipel_2111
record_format openedition
spelling openedition-oai:revues.org:archipel_2111 https://doi.org/10.4000/archipel.2111 urn:doi:10.4000/archipel.2111 en https://journals.openedition.org/archipel/2111 2020-12-02T01:00:00Z info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess article info:eu-repo/semantics/article urn:handle:20.500.13089/a1yl https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ Palu’e Ikat: Nomenclature and Iconography Archipel Association Archipel info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/2104-3655 info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/issn/0044-8613 URI:https://journals.openedition.org/archipel Danerek , Stefan Danerek , Magnus This paper provides a comprehensive documentation of customary Palu’e ikat textiles and investigates the extent to which the design nomenclature and local interpretations constitute an iconography. A multivalent approach is used, starting from linguistic-ethnographic fieldwork and engaging critically with scholarly ikat research and the anthropological methods often applied in studies of traditional textiles, including the underlying assumptions about meaning, symbolism, and mythology. The Palu’e design nomenclature is not embedded in the recorded oral literature, or vice versa. Rather than being repositories for mythology, the cloths signify transmissibility; the act of transmitting them, along with the required craftsmanship skills, from generation to generation assigns them meaning and sacrality. This accounts for the discrepancy observed with compartmentalized or linguistically-inclined inquiries. For weavers, the nomenclature serves as a mnemonic device for memorizing designs, and enables discourse about them. Cet article documente les textiles ikat coutumiers de Palu'e et examine dans quelle mesure la nomenclature des dessins et les interprétations locales constituent une iconographie. Une approche multivalente est utilisée, en partant de travaux de terrain linguistiques et ethnographiques, et en examinant de manière critique la recherche scientifique sur l'ikat et les méthodes anthropologiques souvent appliquées dans les études des textiles traditionnels, y compris les hypothèses sous-jacentes sur la signification, le symbolisme et la mythologie. La nomenclature des motifs de Palu'e ne fait pas partie de la littérature orale connue, ou vice versa. Plutôt que d'être les dépositaires de la mythologie, les vêtements signifient transmissibilité ; l'acte de les transmettre, ainsi que les compétences artisanales requises, de génération en génération, leur confèrant un sens et une sacralité. C'est ce qui explique le décalage observé dans les enquêtes compartimentées ou à orientation linguistique. Pour les tisserands, la nomenclature sert de dispositif mnémonique pour mémoriser les dessins et permet le discours qui s'y rapporte.
collection OpenEdition Journal
language Anglais
format Article ou chapitre numérique
building 0/Bibliothèque numérique/
1/Bibliothèque numérique/OpenEdition Journals/
description This paper provides a comprehensive documentation of customary Palu’e ikat textiles and investigates the extent to which the design nomenclature and local interpretations constitute an iconography. A multivalent approach is used, starting from linguistic-ethnographic fieldwork and engaging critically with scholarly ikat research and the anthropological methods often applied in studies of traditional textiles, including the underlying assumptions about meaning, symbolism, and mythology. The Palu’e design nomenclature is not embedded in the recorded oral literature, or vice versa. Rather than being repositories for mythology, the cloths signify transmissibility; the act of transmitting them, along with the required craftsmanship skills, from generation to generation assigns them meaning and sacrality. This accounts for the discrepancy observed with compartmentalized or linguistically-inclined inquiries. For weavers, the nomenclature serves as a mnemonic device for memorizing designs, and enables discourse about them.
author Danerek , Stefan
Danerek , Magnus
spellingShingle Danerek , Stefan
Danerek , Magnus
Palu’e Ikat: Nomenclature and Iconography
author_facet Danerek , Stefan
Danerek , Magnus
author_sort Danerek , Stefan
title Palu’e Ikat: Nomenclature and Iconography
title_short Palu’e Ikat: Nomenclature and Iconography
title_full Palu’e Ikat: Nomenclature and Iconography
title_fullStr Palu’e Ikat: Nomenclature and Iconography
title_full_unstemmed Palu’e Ikat: Nomenclature and Iconography
title_sort palu’e ikat: nomenclature and iconography
publisher Archipel
publishDate 2020
container_title URI:https://journals.openedition.org/archipel
url https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.4000/archipel.2111
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://journals.openedition.org/archipel/2111
_version_ 1877293812105084928