Damaris Masham face aux philosophes
The English philosopher, Damaris Masham (née Cudworth (1658-1708)) engaged with several philosophers of her time. In her two published books and in her letters, her interlocutors included both the canonical greats (John Locke, Nicolas Malebranche and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz) and philosophers who,...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Sprache: | Français |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2024
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online Zugang: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| id |
cairn-RMM_243_0337 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
cairn |
| spelling |
cairn-RMM_243_0337RMMRevue de métaphysique et de morale https://shs.cairn.info/revue-de-metaphysique-et-de-morale-2024-3-page-337?lang=fr https://doi.org/10.3917/rmm.243.0337 Damaris Masham face aux philosophes Hutton, Sarah2024 CudworthDieulibre arbitreLockeMashamNorrisphilosophie moraleCudworthfree willGodLockeMashammoral philosophyNorrisfre Revue de métaphysique et de morale | 123 | 3 | 2024-09-20 | p. 337-353 | 0035-1571 RMM_24319 The English philosopher, Damaris Masham (née Cudworth (1658-1708)) engaged with several philosophers of her time. In her two published books and in her letters, her interlocutors included both the canonical greats (John Locke, Nicolas Malebranche and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz) and philosophers who, nowadays, are considered “minor” figures (John Norris and Ralph Cudworth), as well as (more indirectly) Pierre Bayle and Mary Astell. In this article I focus chiefly on her interaction with Locke and Cudworth, but I also touch on her response to Malebranche and Norris. I examine her engagement with Locke and Cudworth in order to clarify her philosophical position in relation to theirs, and to question the value of histories of philosophy where the parameters have been fixed without taking account of the contribution of women – in this case, the utility of “empiricism” and “rationalism” as classificatory categories for seventeenth century philosophy.Cet article discute la philosophie de Damaris Masham (née Cudworth) (1658-1708), qui a dialogué avec plusieurs philosophes de son époque dans ses deux livres et ses lettres. Parmi ses interlocuteurs philosophiques figurent non seulement de grands philosophes, canoniques (John Locke, Nicolas Malebranche, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz), mais aussi des philosophes considérés aujourd’hui comme « mineurs » (John Norris, et Ralph Cudworth) – ainsi que, plus indirectement, Pierre Bayle et Mary Astell. La plus grande partie de mon analyse portera sur sa discussion avec Locke et Cudworth, mais j’aborde aussi son rapport à Malebranche et Norris. Je retrace son rapport avec Locke et Cudworth afin de clarifier sa position philosophique vis-à-vis de ces interlocuteurs, et d’interroger la valeur d’une histoire de la philosophie dont les paramètres ont été fixés sans prise en compte de la contribution des femmes – dans le cas présent, il s’agit de remettre en cause l’utilité de l’« empirisme » et du « rationalisme » comme catégories classificatoires.Cairn restricted access |
| language |
Français |
| format |
Article ou chapitre numérique |
| building |
0/Bibliothèque numérique/ 1/Bibliothèque numérique/Cairn/ |
| topic |
Cudworth Dieu libre arbitre Locke Masham Norris philosophie morale Cudworth free will God Locke Masham moral philosophy Norris |
| spellingShingle |
Cudworth Dieu libre arbitre Locke Masham Norris philosophie morale Cudworth free will God Locke Masham moral philosophy Norris Hutton, Sarah Damaris Masham face aux philosophes |
| topic_facet |
Cudworth Dieu libre arbitre Locke Masham Norris philosophie morale Cudworth free will God Locke Masham moral philosophy Norris |
| description |
The English philosopher, Damaris Masham (née Cudworth (1658-1708)) engaged with several philosophers of her time. In her two published books and in her letters, her interlocutors included both the canonical greats (John Locke, Nicolas Malebranche and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz) and philosophers who, nowadays, are considered “minor” figures (John Norris and Ralph Cudworth), as well as (more indirectly) Pierre Bayle and Mary Astell. In this article I focus chiefly on her interaction with Locke and Cudworth, but I also touch on her response to Malebranche and Norris. I examine her engagement with Locke and Cudworth in order to clarify her philosophical position in relation to theirs, and to question the value of histories of philosophy where the parameters have been fixed without taking account of the contribution of women – in this case, the utility of “empiricism” and “rationalism” as classificatory categories for seventeenth century philosophy. |
| author |
Hutton, Sarah |
| author_facet |
Hutton, Sarah |
| author_sort |
Hutton, Sarah |
| title |
Damaris Masham face aux philosophes |
| title_short |
Damaris Masham face aux philosophes |
| title_full |
Damaris Masham face aux philosophes |
| title_fullStr |
Damaris Masham face aux philosophes |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Damaris Masham face aux philosophes |
| title_sort |
damaris masham face aux philosophes |
| publishDate |
2024 |
| container_title |
|
| container_issue |
|
| url |
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://shs.cairn.info/revue-de-metaphysique-et-de-morale-2024-3-page-337?lang=fr https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.3917/rmm.243.0337 |
| _version_ |
1877246741439315968 |