Life and work across the Irish border through Brexit

Changing the status of the Irish border to an external boundary between the UK and the EU was always going to be difficult to manage. Both the UK and the EU shared the objective of avoiding a hard border but finding the means of doing so proved to be a complex technical and diplomatic challenge. Whi...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Hayward, Katy
Format: Article ou chapitre numérique
Langue:Français
Publié: 2020
Accès en ligne:Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
id cairn-RINDU1_203_0101
record_format cairn
spelling cairn-RINDU1_203_0101RINDU1Annales des Mines - Réalités industrielles https://stm.cairn.info/revue-realites-industrielles-2020-3-page-101?lang=en https://doi.org/10.3917/rindu1.203.0101 Life and work across the Irish border through Brexit Hayward, Katy2020 fre Annales des Mines - Réalités industrielles | Août 2020 | 3 | 2020-07-10 | p. 101-105 | 1148-7941 RINDU1_20322 Changing the status of the Irish border to an external boundary between the UK and the EU was always going to be difficult to manage. Both the UK and the EU shared the objective of avoiding a hard border but finding the means of doing so proved to be a complex technical and diplomatic challenge. Whilst the withdrawal negotiations continued, concerns grew among those who would be most directly affected. Despite a history of conflict and underdevelopment, the Irish border region had become one of the most successfully integrated in the world. This only increased the potential price to be paid for Brexit by those living and working there. Successful cross-border development depends on the conditions for, and habits of, cooperation fostered ‘on the ground’. The Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland in the Withdrawal Agreement brings some assurance about maintaining the conditions of north/south cooperation. Nonetheless, the UK/EU border problem that falls on Northern Ireland will persist as a topic in perpetual need of political sensitivity and accommodation.Cairn free access
language Français
format Article ou chapitre numérique
building 0/Bibliothèque numérique/
1/Bibliothèque numérique/Cairn/
description Changing the status of the Irish border to an external boundary between the UK and the EU was always going to be difficult to manage. Both the UK and the EU shared the objective of avoiding a hard border but finding the means of doing so proved to be a complex technical and diplomatic challenge. Whilst the withdrawal negotiations continued, concerns grew among those who would be most directly affected. Despite a history of conflict and underdevelopment, the Irish border region had become one of the most successfully integrated in the world. This only increased the potential price to be paid for Brexit by those living and working there. Successful cross-border development depends on the conditions for, and habits of, cooperation fostered ‘on the ground’. The Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland in the Withdrawal Agreement brings some assurance about maintaining the conditions of north/south cooperation. Nonetheless, the UK/EU border problem that falls on Northern Ireland will persist as a topic in perpetual need of political sensitivity and accommodation.
author Hayward, Katy
spellingShingle Hayward, Katy
Life and work across the Irish border through Brexit
author_facet Hayward, Katy
author_sort Hayward, Katy
title Life and work across the Irish border through Brexit
title_short Life and work across the Irish border through Brexit
title_full Life and work across the Irish border through Brexit
title_fullStr Life and work across the Irish border through Brexit
title_full_unstemmed Life and work across the Irish border through Brexit
title_sort life and work across the irish border through brexit
publishDate 2020
container_title
container_issue
url https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://stm.cairn.info/revue-realites-industrielles-2020-3-page-101?lang=en
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.3917/rindu1.203.0101
_version_ 1877246680239177728