The retreat from systemic risk regulation: what explains it? (and why it was predictable)

Financial crises usually trigger a predictable cycle: first, a populist outburst that produces dramatic legislative and regulatory changes and, then, a slower counter-reaction as the financial industry gradually subjects the new reforms to a death by a thousand cuts, often with the result that littl...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Coffee Jr., John C.
Natura: Article ou chapitre numérique
Lingua:Français
Pubblicazione: 2018
Accesso online:Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
id cairn-RINDU1_184_0080
record_format cairn
spelling cairn-RINDU1_184_0080RINDU1Annales des Mines - Réalités industrielles https://stm.cairn.info/revue-realites-industrielles-2018-4-page-80?lang=en https://doi.org/10.3917/rindu1.184.0080 The retreat from systemic risk regulation: what explains it? (and why it was predictable) Coffee Jr., John C.2018 fre Annales des Mines - Réalités industrielles | ovembre 2018 | 4 | 2018-10-22 | p. 80-90 | 1148-7941 RINDU1_18487 Financial crises usually trigger a predictable cycle: first, a populist outburst that produces dramatic legislative and regulatory changes and, then, a slower counter-reaction as the financial industry gradually subjects the new reforms to a death by a thousand cuts, often with the result that little remains. This cycle – here called the “Regulatory Sine Curve” – can be traced back to the South Sea Bubble in 1720. In the aftermath of 2008, this cycle seems to be again in progress in the United States, as many of the Dodd-Frank Act’s reforms have either gone unimplemented or have been partially repealed. But the same cycle does not appear to be occurring in Europe. This brief essay analyzes these differing responses and seeks to explain why Europe seems better insulated against counter-reaction.Cairn free access
language Français
format Article ou chapitre numérique
building 0/Bibliothèque numérique/
1/Bibliothèque numérique/Cairn/
description Financial crises usually trigger a predictable cycle: first, a populist outburst that produces dramatic legislative and regulatory changes and, then, a slower counter-reaction as the financial industry gradually subjects the new reforms to a death by a thousand cuts, often with the result that little remains. This cycle – here called the “Regulatory Sine Curve” – can be traced back to the South Sea Bubble in 1720. In the aftermath of 2008, this cycle seems to be again in progress in the United States, as many of the Dodd-Frank Act’s reforms have either gone unimplemented or have been partially repealed. But the same cycle does not appear to be occurring in Europe. This brief essay analyzes these differing responses and seeks to explain why Europe seems better insulated against counter-reaction.
author Coffee Jr., John C.
spellingShingle Coffee Jr., John C.
The retreat from systemic risk regulation: what explains it? (and why it was predictable)
author_facet Coffee Jr., John C.
author_sort Coffee Jr., John C.
title The retreat from systemic risk regulation: what explains it? (and why it was predictable)
title_short The retreat from systemic risk regulation: what explains it? (and why it was predictable)
title_full The retreat from systemic risk regulation: what explains it? (and why it was predictable)
title_fullStr The retreat from systemic risk regulation: what explains it? (and why it was predictable)
title_full_unstemmed The retreat from systemic risk regulation: what explains it? (and why it was predictable)
title_sort retreat from systemic risk regulation: what explains it? (and why it was predictable)
publishDate 2018
container_title
container_issue
url https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://stm.cairn.info/revue-realites-industrielles-2018-4-page-80?lang=en
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.3917/rindu1.184.0080
_version_ 1877246679755784192