Trois objections fondamentales contre le TTIP (Traité commercial transatlantique)
Should the EU design transatlantic free trade agreements (FTAs) as a power-oriented “international law among states”, a “democratic law among peoples”, or as a “cosmopolitan law among individuals” as the legitimate “constituent powers” and “democratic principals” of all governance agents in the 21st...
Enregistré dans:
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Langue: | Français |
| Publié: |
2017
|
| Accès en ligne: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| id |
cairn-RIDE_304_0481 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
cairn |
| spelling |
cairn-RIDE_304_0481RIDERevue internationale de droit économique https://droit.cairn.info/revue-internationale-de-droit-economique-2016-4-page-481?lang=fr https://doi.org/10.3917/ride.304.0481 Trois objections fondamentales contre le TTIP (Traité commercial transatlantique) Defraigne, Pierre2017 fre Revue internationale de droit économique | t. XXX | 4 | 2017-04-04 | p. 481-491 | 1010-8831 RIDE_30435 Should the EU design transatlantic free trade agreements (FTAs) as a power-oriented “international law among states”, a “democratic law among peoples”, or as a “cosmopolitan law among individuals” as the legitimate “constituent powers” and “democratic principals” of all governance agents in the 21st century ? Why are fundamental rights so important for reforming “disconnected UN/WTO governance” so as to render multilevel protection of transnational public goods (PGs) more effective for the benefit of citizens ? FTAs protecting rights and remedies of citizens have been uniquely successful in European integration, for instance by limiting “governance failures” and “market failures” (e.g. through constitutional, competition, labour, social and environmental law and judicial remedies). Yet, the EU neglects its “cosmopolitan foreign policy mandate” in FTA negotiations with non-European countries. European citizens criticize transatlantic FTAs for disregarding fundamental rights and judicial remedies inside the EU. Rather than exercising leadership as a “protector of citizens” in the necessary reforms of “disconnected UN/WTO governance” of transnational PGs by designing FTAs among democracies as “cosmopolitan international law”, the EU institutions prioritize bureaucratic self-interests in reducing legal, democratic and judicial accountability vis-à-vis citizens in the trade policy area, thereby aggravating the EU’s legitimacy – and rule-of-law-crises.Cairn free access |
| language |
Français |
| format |
Article ou chapitre numérique |
| building |
0/Bibliothèque numérique/ 1/Bibliothèque numérique/Cairn/ |
| description |
Should the EU design transatlantic free trade agreements (FTAs) as a power-oriented “international law among states”, a “democratic law among peoples”, or as a “cosmopolitan law among individuals” as the legitimate “constituent powers” and “democratic principals” of all governance agents in the 21st century ? Why are fundamental rights so important for reforming “disconnected UN/WTO governance” so as to render multilevel protection of transnational public goods (PGs) more effective for the benefit of citizens ? FTAs protecting rights and remedies of citizens have been uniquely successful in European integration, for instance by limiting “governance failures” and “market failures” (e.g. through constitutional, competition, labour, social and environmental law and judicial remedies). Yet, the EU neglects its “cosmopolitan foreign policy mandate” in FTA negotiations with non-European countries. European citizens criticize transatlantic FTAs for disregarding fundamental rights and judicial remedies inside the EU. Rather than exercising leadership as a “protector of citizens” in the necessary reforms of “disconnected UN/WTO governance” of transnational PGs by designing FTAs among democracies as “cosmopolitan international law”, the EU institutions prioritize bureaucratic self-interests in reducing legal, democratic and judicial accountability vis-à-vis citizens in the trade policy area, thereby aggravating the EU’s legitimacy – and rule-of-law-crises. |
| author |
Defraigne, Pierre |
| spellingShingle |
Defraigne, Pierre Trois objections fondamentales contre le TTIP (Traité commercial transatlantique) |
| author_facet |
Defraigne, Pierre |
| author_sort |
Defraigne, Pierre |
| title |
Trois objections fondamentales contre le TTIP (Traité commercial transatlantique) |
| title_short |
Trois objections fondamentales contre le TTIP (Traité commercial transatlantique) |
| title_full |
Trois objections fondamentales contre le TTIP (Traité commercial transatlantique) |
| title_fullStr |
Trois objections fondamentales contre le TTIP (Traité commercial transatlantique) |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Trois objections fondamentales contre le TTIP (Traité commercial transatlantique) |
| title_sort |
trois objections fondamentales contre le ttip (traité commercial transatlantique) |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| container_title |
|
| container_issue |
|
| url |
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://droit.cairn.info/revue-internationale-de-droit-economique-2016-4-page-481?lang=fr https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.3917/ride.304.0481 |
| _version_ |
1877246660604592128 |