La Shoah entre histoire et mémoire. Une typologie des postures antisémites dans la Roumanie post-communiste (1989-2009)
An Updated Motivational Typology of Romania’s Radical Right’s Anti-Semitic Postures in Post-CommunismPost-communist anti-Semitism in Romania and elsewhere in East Central Europe is not necessarily driven by the same motivations. Basically, each of the categories the author employs in the taxonomy (u...
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Lingua: | Français |
| Pubblicazione: |
2011
|
| Accesso online: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Riassunto: | An Updated Motivational Typology of Romania’s Radical Right’s Anti-Semitic Postures in Post-CommunismPost-communist anti-Semitism in Romania and elsewhere in East Central Europe is not necessarily driven by the same motivations. Basically, each of the categories the author employs in the taxonomy (updating earlier endeavors) acts out of a different motivation and has a different temporal orientation. What they all share, however, is precisely the attempt to respond to the need to produce what Benedict Anderson called an “imagined community,” in albeit significantly different positive terms of reference. A distinction is made between the following taxonomic categories of “producers” of anti-Semitism :a) “Self-exculpatory nostalgic anti-Semitism ;”b) “Self-propelling anti-Semitism” ;c) “Neo-populist mercantile anti-Semitism” ;d) “Utilitarian anti-Semitism” ;e) “Reactive anti-Semitism ;and, finally, f) “Vengeance anti-Semitism.” |
|---|