Une vie de lutte et de résistance. Témoignage de Rose Mukankomeje

History according to the defeatedHistorical revisionism of the Tutsi genocide has gone through a change in its argumentative structure in recent years under the influence of the defence at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR). The theory of “double genocide”, now abandoned, came abo...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Mugiraneza, Assumpta
Format: Article ou chapitre numérique
Langue:Français
Publié: 2009
Accès en ligne:Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
id cairn-RHSHO_190_0349
record_format cairn
spelling cairn-RHSHO_190_0349RHSHORevue d’Histoire de la Shoah https://shs.cairn.info/revue-d-histoire-de-la-shoah-2009-1-page-349?lang=fr https://doi.org/10.3917/rhsho.190.0349 Une vie de lutte et de résistance. Témoignage de Rose Mukankomeje Mugiraneza, Assumpta2009 fre Revue d’Histoire de la Shoah | 190 | 1 | 2009-02-03 | p. 349-364 | 2111-885X RHSHO_19016 History according to the defeatedHistorical revisionism of the Tutsi genocide has gone through a change in its argumentative structure in recent years under the influence of the defence at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR). The theory of “double genocide”, now abandoned, came about at the time when the Investigation Commission on the Genocide was formed in 1994, first to justify it and later to discourage the possibility of a trial. Taking advantage of real or perceived weaknesses in the international criminal justice system, the revisionists seek to rewrite history. In this paper the author analyzes a set of publications by Rwandan intellectuals —or those that present themselves as such— some of whom were or still stand on trial before the ICTR. The study of these texts highlights the continuous link between the ideologies that have presided over the genocide and its denial. Among other things, it allows us to point out the ideological and political purpose that formed the basis for this type of discourse.Cairn free access
language Français
format Article ou chapitre numérique
building 0/Bibliothèque numérique/
1/Bibliothèque numérique/Cairn/
description History according to the defeatedHistorical revisionism of the Tutsi genocide has gone through a change in its argumentative structure in recent years under the influence of the defence at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR). The theory of “double genocide”, now abandoned, came about at the time when the Investigation Commission on the Genocide was formed in 1994, first to justify it and later to discourage the possibility of a trial. Taking advantage of real or perceived weaknesses in the international criminal justice system, the revisionists seek to rewrite history. In this paper the author analyzes a set of publications by Rwandan intellectuals —or those that present themselves as such— some of whom were or still stand on trial before the ICTR. The study of these texts highlights the continuous link between the ideologies that have presided over the genocide and its denial. Among other things, it allows us to point out the ideological and political purpose that formed the basis for this type of discourse.
author Mugiraneza, Assumpta
spellingShingle Mugiraneza, Assumpta
Une vie de lutte et de résistance. Témoignage de Rose Mukankomeje
author_facet Mugiraneza, Assumpta
author_sort Mugiraneza, Assumpta
title Une vie de lutte et de résistance. Témoignage de Rose Mukankomeje
title_short Une vie de lutte et de résistance. Témoignage de Rose Mukankomeje
title_full Une vie de lutte et de résistance. Témoignage de Rose Mukankomeje
title_fullStr Une vie de lutte et de résistance. Témoignage de Rose Mukankomeje
title_full_unstemmed Une vie de lutte et de résistance. Témoignage de Rose Mukankomeje
title_sort une vie de lutte et de résistance. témoignage de rose mukankomeje
publishDate 2009
container_title
container_issue
url https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://shs.cairn.info/revue-d-histoire-de-la-shoah-2009-1-page-349?lang=fr
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.3917/rhsho.190.0349
_version_ 1877246646420504576