Pillage et (non) restitution des œuvres d’art aux Pays-Bas (1940-2001)

The German system of looting in the Netherlands during the World War II has been remarkably systematic and it were mostly Jews who fell victim to the greed of the German occupiers. The expropriations in the Low Countries were generally based on decrees ( Verordnungen) which had the force of statute...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Aalders, Gerard, Darmon, Claire
Format: Article ou chapitre numérique
Langue:Français
Publié: 2007
Accès en ligne:Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
id cairn-RHSHO_186_0195
record_format cairn
spelling cairn-RHSHO_186_0195RHSHORevue d’Histoire de la Shoah https://shs.cairn.info/revue-d-histoire-de-la-shoah-2007-1-page-195?lang=fr https://doi.org/10.3917/rhsho.186.0195 Pillage et (non) restitution des œuvres d’art aux Pays-Bas (1940-2001) Aalders, GerardDarmon, Claire2007 fre Revue d’Histoire de la Shoah | 186 | 1 | 2007-03-08 | p. 195-216 | 2111-885X RHSHO_1866 The German system of looting in the Netherlands during the World War II has been remarkably systematic and it were mostly Jews who fell victim to the greed of the German occupiers. The expropriations in the Low Countries were generally based on decrees ( Verordnungen) which had the force of statute law. The looting of art has been a special chapter in the history of spoliation. Adolf Hitler and the second man of the Reich, Hermann Göring, were both interested in art with a preference for paintings and sculptures. Both men had their own special agent for the acquiring of pieces of art in the Netherlands. The Dutch government in exile (London) prepared laws to restitute the looted possessions to their lawful owners. So both looting and restitution was a matter a of law, but as the article shows there are remarkable differences between law and justice.Cairn free access
language Français
format Article ou chapitre numérique
building 0/Bibliothèque numérique/
1/Bibliothèque numérique/Cairn/
description The German system of looting in the Netherlands during the World War II has been remarkably systematic and it were mostly Jews who fell victim to the greed of the German occupiers. The expropriations in the Low Countries were generally based on decrees ( Verordnungen) which had the force of statute law. The looting of art has been a special chapter in the history of spoliation. Adolf Hitler and the second man of the Reich, Hermann Göring, were both interested in art with a preference for paintings and sculptures. Both men had their own special agent for the acquiring of pieces of art in the Netherlands. The Dutch government in exile (London) prepared laws to restitute the looted possessions to their lawful owners. So both looting and restitution was a matter a of law, but as the article shows there are remarkable differences between law and justice.
author Aalders, Gerard
Darmon, Claire
spellingShingle Aalders, Gerard
Darmon, Claire
Pillage et (non) restitution des œuvres d’art aux Pays-Bas (1940-2001)
author_facet Aalders, Gerard
Darmon, Claire
author_sort Aalders, Gerard
title Pillage et (non) restitution des œuvres d’art aux Pays-Bas (1940-2001)
title_short Pillage et (non) restitution des œuvres d’art aux Pays-Bas (1940-2001)
title_full Pillage et (non) restitution des œuvres d’art aux Pays-Bas (1940-2001)
title_fullStr Pillage et (non) restitution des œuvres d’art aux Pays-Bas (1940-2001)
title_full_unstemmed Pillage et (non) restitution des œuvres d’art aux Pays-Bas (1940-2001)
title_sort pillage et (non) restitution des œuvres d’art aux pays-bas (1940-2001)
publishDate 2007
container_title
container_issue
url https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://shs.cairn.info/revue-d-histoire-de-la-shoah-2007-1-page-195?lang=fr
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.3917/rhsho.186.0195
_version_ 1877246646020997120