Variables, Mechanisms, and Simulations : Can the Three Methods Be Synthesized ?

This article offers a critical analysis of four contemporary sociological debates. Systematic analysis of the relevant literature suggests the existence of a project for reformulating the methodological foundations of empirical quantitative sociology. This reconstruction shows the emergence of the...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Manzo, Gianluca
Format: Article ou chapitre numérique
Langue:Français
Publié: 2007
Accès en ligne:Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
id cairn-RFS_485_0035
record_format cairn
spelling cairn-RFS_485_0035RFS1Revue française de sociologie https://shs.cairn.info/revue-francaise-de-sociologie-1-2007-5-page-35?lang=en https://doi.org/10.3917/rfs.485.0035 Variables, Mechanisms, and Simulations : Can the Three Methods Be Synthesized ? Manzo, Gianluca2007 fre Revue française de sociologie | 48 | 5 | 2007-12-15 | p. 35-71 | 0035-2969 RFS_48533 This article offers a critical analysis of four contemporary sociological debates. Systematic analysis of the relevant literature suggests the existence of a project for reformulating the methodological foundations of empirical quantitative sociology. This reconstruction shows the emergence of the following idea: an alliance of variable analysis, mechanism methodology, and simulation techniques would be of great help in resolving some of the impasses that “standard” empirical quantitative sociology encounters. This thesis is then tested for quantitative sociology of social stratification: where there are “irrefutable signs” that the idea is becoming acceptable. Lastly, a link is established between these recent debates and older, similar proposals for resolving the problem, and the question of why the soundness of these proposals has only recently been recognized is examined.Cairn free access
language Français
format Article ou chapitre numérique
building 0/Bibliothèque numérique/
1/Bibliothèque numérique/Cairn/
description This article offers a critical analysis of four contemporary sociological debates. Systematic analysis of the relevant literature suggests the existence of a project for reformulating the methodological foundations of empirical quantitative sociology. This reconstruction shows the emergence of the following idea: an alliance of variable analysis, mechanism methodology, and simulation techniques would be of great help in resolving some of the impasses that “standard” empirical quantitative sociology encounters. This thesis is then tested for quantitative sociology of social stratification: where there are “irrefutable signs” that the idea is becoming acceptable. Lastly, a link is established between these recent debates and older, similar proposals for resolving the problem, and the question of why the soundness of these proposals has only recently been recognized is examined.
author Manzo, Gianluca
spellingShingle Manzo, Gianluca
Variables, Mechanisms, and Simulations : Can the Three Methods Be Synthesized ?
author_facet Manzo, Gianluca
author_sort Manzo, Gianluca
title Variables, Mechanisms, and Simulations : Can the Three Methods Be Synthesized ?
title_short Variables, Mechanisms, and Simulations : Can the Three Methods Be Synthesized ?
title_full Variables, Mechanisms, and Simulations : Can the Three Methods Be Synthesized ?
title_fullStr Variables, Mechanisms, and Simulations : Can the Three Methods Be Synthesized ?
title_full_unstemmed Variables, Mechanisms, and Simulations : Can the Three Methods Be Synthesized ?
title_sort variables, mechanisms, and simulations : can the three methods be synthesized ?
publishDate 2007
container_title
container_issue
url https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://shs.cairn.info/revue-francaise-de-sociologie-1-2007-5-page-35?lang=en
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.3917/rfs.485.0035
_version_ 1877246588503457792