Adolescence, Post-Adolescence, Youth: Revised Interpretations
The terms adolescence, post-adolescence, and youth are often employed as nearsynonyms to designate the life period between childhood and adulthood. In fact, the terms are linked to distinct sociological interpretations, though these may be only implicit. This article aims to clarify those interpret...
שמור ב:
| מחבר ראשי: | |
|---|---|
| פורמט: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| שפה: | Français |
| יצא לאור: |
2003
|
| גישה מקוונת: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| סיכום: | The terms adolescence, post-adolescence, and youth are often employed as nearsynonyms to designate the life period between childhood and adulthood. In fact, the terms are
linked to distinct sociological interpretations, though these may be only implicit. This article aims to clarify those interpretations, first on the basis of an article by Parsons, who, in
1942 proposed one of the first sociological analyses of “youth culture”, defining adolescence as a culture of irresponsibility. The theme of “post-adolescence” developed later out
of this idea. Other studies, on the contrary, sought to establish a radical distinction between
adolescence and youth, the latter defined as “a new life period”. Critical review of this thesis leads to revising it on two important points. First, though “youth” is distinct from adolescence as defined by Parsons, it does not constitute, or not as fully as had been believed, a
clearly separate life phase relative to those preceding and following it; indeed, the primary
characteristic of adolescence is that it establishes continuity between those phases. Second,
international comparative studies conducted in the last few years show extraordinary countrytocountry variation in the cultural dispositions and institutional arrangements that organize this life phase. |
|---|