Eco-Bio-Formalism: Nineteenth-Century US Literature as Critical Archive

This second section examines the notion of periodization from various perspectives, as a scientific, institutional, and political construct. Nicolas Martin-Breteau revisits fifty years of African American history in light of the “1619 Project.” Thomas Constantinesco and Cécile Roudeau suggest approa...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Constantinesco, Thomas, Roudeau, Cécile
Formato: Article ou chapitre numérique
Lenguaje:Français
Publicado: 2026
Acceso en línea:Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
id cairn-RFEA_187_0048
record_format cairn
spelling cairn-RFEA_187_0048RFEARevue française d’études américaines https://shs.cairn.info/revue-francaise-d-etudes-americaines-2026-2-page-48?lang=en https://doi.org/10.3917/rfea.187.0048 Eco-Bio-Formalism: Nineteenth-Century US Literature as Critical Archive Constantinesco, ThomasRoudeau, Cécile2026 fre Revue française d’études américaines | 187 | 2 | 2026-06-22 | p. 48-51 | 0397-7870 RFEA_18759 This second section examines the notion of periodization from various perspectives, as a scientific, institutional, and political construct. Nicolas Martin-Breteau revisits fifty years of African American history in light of the “1619 Project.” Thomas Constantinesco and Cécile Roudeau suggest approaching the nineteenth century as a “vast archive” of “fruitful anachronisms” through the lens of environmental and medical humanities. Caroline Hildebrandt examines new tools of literary history—longue durée, transitions, systems—that make periods ever more fluid. Agnès Delahaye focuses on deconstructing the colonial discourse underlying revolutionary periodization, while Benoît Tadié traces the transatlantic genesis of noir fiction. Together, these contributions call for a decolonization of established temporalities, a multiplication of analytical scales, and the inception of alternative temporalities capable of renewing American Studies epistemology.Cairn restricted access
language Français
format Article ou chapitre numérique
building 0/Bibliothèque numérique/
1/Bibliothèque numérique/Cairn/
description This second section examines the notion of periodization from various perspectives, as a scientific, institutional, and political construct. Nicolas Martin-Breteau revisits fifty years of African American history in light of the “1619 Project.” Thomas Constantinesco and Cécile Roudeau suggest approaching the nineteenth century as a “vast archive” of “fruitful anachronisms” through the lens of environmental and medical humanities. Caroline Hildebrandt examines new tools of literary history—longue durée, transitions, systems—that make periods ever more fluid. Agnès Delahaye focuses on deconstructing the colonial discourse underlying revolutionary periodization, while Benoît Tadié traces the transatlantic genesis of noir fiction. Together, these contributions call for a decolonization of established temporalities, a multiplication of analytical scales, and the inception of alternative temporalities capable of renewing American Studies epistemology.
author Constantinesco, Thomas
Roudeau, Cécile
spellingShingle Constantinesco, Thomas
Roudeau, Cécile
Eco-Bio-Formalism: Nineteenth-Century US Literature as Critical Archive
author_facet Constantinesco, Thomas
Roudeau, Cécile
author_sort Constantinesco, Thomas
title Eco-Bio-Formalism: Nineteenth-Century US Literature as Critical Archive
title_short Eco-Bio-Formalism: Nineteenth-Century US Literature as Critical Archive
title_full Eco-Bio-Formalism: Nineteenth-Century US Literature as Critical Archive
title_fullStr Eco-Bio-Formalism: Nineteenth-Century US Literature as Critical Archive
title_full_unstemmed Eco-Bio-Formalism: Nineteenth-Century US Literature as Critical Archive
title_sort eco-bio-formalism: nineteenth-century us literature as critical archive
publishDate 2026
container_title
container_issue
url https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://shs.cairn.info/revue-francaise-d-etudes-americaines-2026-2-page-48?lang=en
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.3917/rfea.187.0048
_version_ 1877284617589882880