Cobell vs Salazar 2009 : À la reconquête de la souveraineté tribale sur les terres indiennes ?
This article tackles the issue of tribal sovereignty on Indian territories in relation to the Cobell v. Salazar settlement (Cobell v. Salazar, 573 F. 3d 808, (D.C. Cir.), 2009). As a result of the superimposition of multiple laws and their successive, and sometimes inconsistent, implementation, the...
Guardat en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Idioma: | Français |
| Publicat: |
2016
|
| Matèries: | |
| Accés en línia: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| id |
cairn-RFEA_144_0062 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
cairn |
| spelling |
cairn-RFEA_144_0062RFEARevue française d’études américaines https://shs.cairn.info/revue-francaise-d-etudes-americaines-2015-3-page-62?lang=fr https://doi.org/10.3917/rfea.144.0062 Cobell vs Salazar 2009 : À la reconquête de la souveraineté tribale sur les terres indiennes ? Gergaud, Sophie2016 2009arrêtBureau des affaires indiennesCobell v. SalazarDawes Actdroit indiengouvernancepropriété foncièreréserves indiennessouveraineté tribaleterres indiennesfre Revue française d’études américaines | 144 | 3 | 2016-05-24 | p. 62-77 | 0397-7870 RFEA_14474 This article tackles the issue of tribal sovereignty on Indian territories in relation to the Cobell v. Salazar settlement (Cobell v. Salazar, 573 F. 3d 808, (D.C. Cir.), 2009). As a result of the superimposition of multiple laws and their successive, and sometimes inconsistent, implementation, the legal status of Native American lands in the US is highly intricate and testifies to the complexity of articulating indigenous specificity and the different levels of federalism. Cobell v. Salazar, which puts an end to a class-action lawsuit of fourteen years, recognizes that the federal government has mismanaged Indian trust lands and provides for the allocation of a two-million-dollar fund for tribes to repurchase the tiny tracts of individually owned land deriving from the Dawes Act of 1887. What degree of autonomy has the settlement generated? Is it yet another example of negotiated and partial autonomy?Cairn free access |
| language |
Français |
| format |
Article ou chapitre numérique |
| building |
0/Bibliothèque numérique/ 1/Bibliothèque numérique/Cairn/ |
| topic |
2009 arrêt Bureau des affaires indiennes Cobell v. Salazar Dawes Act droit indien gouvernance propriété foncière réserves indiennes souveraineté tribale terres indiennes |
| spellingShingle |
2009 arrêt Bureau des affaires indiennes Cobell v. Salazar Dawes Act droit indien gouvernance propriété foncière réserves indiennes souveraineté tribale terres indiennes Gergaud, Sophie Cobell vs Salazar 2009 : À la reconquête de la souveraineté tribale sur les terres indiennes ? |
| topic_facet |
2009 arrêt Bureau des affaires indiennes Cobell v. Salazar Dawes Act droit indien gouvernance propriété foncière réserves indiennes souveraineté tribale terres indiennes |
| description |
This article tackles the issue of tribal sovereignty on Indian territories in relation to the Cobell v. Salazar settlement (Cobell v. Salazar, 573 F. 3d 808, (D.C. Cir.), 2009). As a result of the superimposition of multiple laws and their successive, and sometimes inconsistent, implementation, the legal status of Native American lands in the US is highly intricate and testifies to the complexity of articulating indigenous specificity and the different levels of federalism. Cobell v. Salazar, which puts an end to a class-action lawsuit of fourteen years, recognizes that the federal government has mismanaged Indian trust lands and provides for the allocation of a two-million-dollar fund for tribes to repurchase the tiny tracts of individually owned land deriving from the Dawes Act of 1887. What degree of autonomy has the settlement generated? Is it yet another example of negotiated and partial autonomy? |
| author |
Gergaud, Sophie |
| author_facet |
Gergaud, Sophie |
| author_sort |
Gergaud, Sophie |
| title |
Cobell vs Salazar 2009 : À la reconquête de la souveraineté tribale sur les terres indiennes ? |
| title_short |
Cobell vs Salazar 2009 : À la reconquête de la souveraineté tribale sur les terres indiennes ? |
| title_full |
Cobell vs Salazar 2009 : À la reconquête de la souveraineté tribale sur les terres indiennes ? |
| title_fullStr |
Cobell vs Salazar 2009 : À la reconquête de la souveraineté tribale sur les terres indiennes ? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Cobell vs Salazar 2009 : À la reconquête de la souveraineté tribale sur les terres indiennes ? |
| title_sort |
cobell vs salazar 2009 : à la reconquête de la souveraineté tribale sur les terres indiennes ? |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| container_title |
|
| container_issue |
|
| url |
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://shs.cairn.info/revue-francaise-d-etudes-americaines-2015-3-page-62?lang=fr https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.3917/rfea.144.0062 |
| _version_ |
1877246550946611200 |