Mimesis travestie, ou le « modernisme épuré » de William H. Gass

Although everything from Cartesian skepticism to Schoenberg’s twelve-tone system of composition has been evoked in discussing the formal logic of William Gass’s novel, The Tunnel (1995), this paper argues that this logic is fundamentally speculative, in the Hegelian sense of the term, and furthermo...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Anker, Richard
Format: Article ou chapitre numérique
Langue:Français
Publié: 2013
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
id cairn-RFEA_135_0051
record_format cairn
spelling cairn-RFEA_135_0051RFEARevue française d’études américaines https://shs.cairn.info/revue-francaise-d-etudes-americaines-2013-1-page-51?lang=fr https://doi.org/10.3917/rfea.135.0051 Mimesis travestie, ou le « modernisme épuré » de William H. Gass Anker, Richard2013 mimesismodernismemythenazismePlatonWilliam GassmimesismodernismmythNazismPlatoWilliam Gassfre Revue française d’études américaines | 135 | 1 | 2013-11-01 | p. 51-65 | 0397-7870 RFEA_13588 Although everything from Cartesian skepticism to Schoenberg’s twelve-tone system of composition has been evoked in discussing the formal logic of William Gass’s novel, The Tunnel (1995), this paper argues that this logic is fundamentally speculative, in the Hegelian sense of the term, and furthermore that the germ of this logic lies in Plato’s double strategy of exclusion and appropriation of mimesis in The Republic. Far from merely repudiating mimesis, Gass’s (“modernist”) form-alism consists of its speculative purification. The same process is at work with less radical consequences in Gass’s previous novel, Omensetter’s Luck (1966), the onto-mimetological structure of which determines the author’s later work.Cairn free access
language Français
format Article ou chapitre numérique
building 0/Bibliothèque numérique/
1/Bibliothèque numérique/Cairn/
topic mimesis
modernisme
mythe
nazisme
Platon
William Gass
mimesis
modernism
myth
Nazism
Plato
William Gass
spellingShingle mimesis
modernisme
mythe
nazisme
Platon
William Gass
mimesis
modernism
myth
Nazism
Plato
William Gass
Anker, Richard
Mimesis travestie, ou le « modernisme épuré » de William H. Gass
topic_facet mimesis
modernisme
mythe
nazisme
Platon
William Gass
mimesis
modernism
myth
Nazism
Plato
William Gass
description Although everything from Cartesian skepticism to Schoenberg’s twelve-tone system of composition has been evoked in discussing the formal logic of William Gass’s novel, The Tunnel (1995), this paper argues that this logic is fundamentally speculative, in the Hegelian sense of the term, and furthermore that the germ of this logic lies in Plato’s double strategy of exclusion and appropriation of mimesis in The Republic. Far from merely repudiating mimesis, Gass’s (“modernist”) form-alism consists of its speculative purification. The same process is at work with less radical consequences in Gass’s previous novel, Omensetter’s Luck (1966), the onto-mimetological structure of which determines the author’s later work.
author Anker, Richard
author_facet Anker, Richard
author_sort Anker, Richard
title Mimesis travestie, ou le « modernisme épuré » de William H. Gass
title_short Mimesis travestie, ou le « modernisme épuré » de William H. Gass
title_full Mimesis travestie, ou le « modernisme épuré » de William H. Gass
title_fullStr Mimesis travestie, ou le « modernisme épuré » de William H. Gass
title_full_unstemmed Mimesis travestie, ou le « modernisme épuré » de William H. Gass
title_sort mimesis travestie, ou le « modernisme épuré » de william h. gass
publishDate 2013
container_title
container_issue
url https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://shs.cairn.info/revue-francaise-d-etudes-americaines-2013-1-page-51?lang=fr
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.3917/rfea.135.0051
_version_ 1877246550455877632