Martha Derthick, ed. Dilemmas of Scale in America’s Federal Democracy. Woodrow Wilson Center Series. Cambridge : Cambridge UP, 1999. 386 p.

With security experts so many and prominent in its ranks, the Bush Administration unsurprisingly came to power with a far-reaching strategic agenda. The project implies redirecting US foreign and security policy away from vaguely-defined objectives and undiscerning interventions. Practically, its pr...

Ful tanımlama

Kaydedildi:
Detaylı Bibliyografya
Yazar: Pouzoulet, Catherine
Materyal Türü: Article ou chapitre numérique
Dil:Français
Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: 2001
Online Erişim:Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
id cairn-RFEA_090_123d
record_format cairn
spelling cairn-RFEA_090_123dRFEARevue française d’études américaines https://shs.cairn.info/revue-francaise-d-etudes-americaines-2001-4-page-123d?lang=fr Martha Derthick, ed. Dilemmas of Scale in America’s Federal Democracy. Woodrow Wilson Center Series. Cambridge : Cambridge UP, 1999. 386 p. Pouzoulet, Catherine2001 fre Revue française d’études américaines | 90 | 4 | 2001-10-01 | p. 123d-128d | 0397-7870 RFEA_09018 With security experts so many and prominent in its ranks, the Bush Administration unsurprisingly came to power with a far-reaching strategic agenda. The project implies redirecting US foreign and security policy away from vaguely-defined objectives and undiscerning interventions. Practically, its proponents claim, it means acting more selectively yet more decisively, reducing US commitments and exposure abroad while enhancing its freedom of action and military power. On both accounts, this policy has fueled international and European resentment over “US unilateralism”. Strategic defenses are probably the most contending issue: while the Bush Administration considers the rapid deployment of missile defenses to be of paramount importance, many US allies see them as superfluous or, worse, destabilizing, not to mention great powers adamantly opposed to the project, such as China. Whatever the final decision, missile defenses are but a part of a grander scheme, supported by the proponents of the so-called “Revolution in Military Affairs”. Within that framework of technological and military dominance, missile defenses are closely linked to the protection of US space assets and therefore with the militarization of outer space.Cairn free access
language Français
format Article ou chapitre numérique
building 0/Bibliothèque numérique/
1/Bibliothèque numérique/Cairn/
description With security experts so many and prominent in its ranks, the Bush Administration unsurprisingly came to power with a far-reaching strategic agenda. The project implies redirecting US foreign and security policy away from vaguely-defined objectives and undiscerning interventions. Practically, its proponents claim, it means acting more selectively yet more decisively, reducing US commitments and exposure abroad while enhancing its freedom of action and military power. On both accounts, this policy has fueled international and European resentment over “US unilateralism”. Strategic defenses are probably the most contending issue: while the Bush Administration considers the rapid deployment of missile defenses to be of paramount importance, many US allies see them as superfluous or, worse, destabilizing, not to mention great powers adamantly opposed to the project, such as China. Whatever the final decision, missile defenses are but a part of a grander scheme, supported by the proponents of the so-called “Revolution in Military Affairs”. Within that framework of technological and military dominance, missile defenses are closely linked to the protection of US space assets and therefore with the militarization of outer space.
author Pouzoulet, Catherine
spellingShingle Pouzoulet, Catherine
Martha Derthick, ed. Dilemmas of Scale in America’s Federal Democracy. Woodrow Wilson Center Series. Cambridge : Cambridge UP, 1999. 386 p.
author_facet Pouzoulet, Catherine
author_sort Pouzoulet, Catherine
title Martha Derthick, ed. Dilemmas of Scale in America’s Federal Democracy. Woodrow Wilson Center Series. Cambridge : Cambridge UP, 1999. 386 p.
title_short Martha Derthick, ed. Dilemmas of Scale in America’s Federal Democracy. Woodrow Wilson Center Series. Cambridge : Cambridge UP, 1999. 386 p.
title_full Martha Derthick, ed. Dilemmas of Scale in America’s Federal Democracy. Woodrow Wilson Center Series. Cambridge : Cambridge UP, 1999. 386 p.
title_fullStr Martha Derthick, ed. Dilemmas of Scale in America’s Federal Democracy. Woodrow Wilson Center Series. Cambridge : Cambridge UP, 1999. 386 p.
title_full_unstemmed Martha Derthick, ed. Dilemmas of Scale in America’s Federal Democracy. Woodrow Wilson Center Series. Cambridge : Cambridge UP, 1999. 386 p.
title_sort martha derthick, ed. dilemmas of scale in america’s federal democracy. woodrow wilson center series. cambridge : cambridge up, 1999. 386 p.
publishDate 2001
container_title
container_issue
url https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://shs.cairn.info/revue-francaise-d-etudes-americaines-2001-4-page-123d?lang=fr
_version_ 1877246548493991936