Bernard Hœpffner. Guy Davenport. Paris : Belin, 1998. 128 p. 50 F.

Bernard Hœpffner. Guy Davenport. Paris : Belin, 1998. 128 p. 50 F.

In 1963, Congress voted The Equal Pay Act and in 1964 Title VII of The Civil Rights Act prohibited sex discrimination in the workplace. These laws provided women with essential protections, as they began to enter the workforce in large numbers. The Supreme Court and lower federal courts were instrum...

Mô tả đầy đủ

Đã lưu trong:
Chi tiết về thư mục
Tác giả chính: Happe, François
Định dạng: Article ou chapitre numérique
Ngôn ngữ:Français
Được phát hành: 2001
Truy cập trực tuyến:Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM
id cairn-RFEA_087_0112h
record_format cairn
spelling cairn-RFEA_087_0112hRFEARevue française d’études américaines https://shs.cairn.info/revue-francaise-d-etudes-americaines-2001-1-page-112h?lang=fr Bernard Hœpffner. Guy Davenport. Paris : Belin, 1998. 128 p. 50 F. Happe, François2001 fre Revue française d’études américaines | 87 | 1 | 2001-03-01 | p. 112h-128h | 0397-7870 RFEA_08766 In 1963, Congress voted The Equal Pay Act and in 1964 Title VII of The Civil Rights Act prohibited sex discrimination in the workplace. These laws provided women with essential protections, as they began to enter the workforce in large numbers. The Supreme Court and lower federal courts were instrumental in elaborating jurisprudence under these Acts, striking down gender-biased laws and upholding Affirmative Action plans. In 1978, Title VII was amended so as to protect pregnant women from discrimination policies and in 1986, the Court affirmed that sexual harassment was sex discrimination. Feminist writers and groups have often pondered over the ability of the judicial and legislative powers to advance the cause of women ; and taking stock, they offer contrasting views.Cairn free access
language Français
format Article ou chapitre numérique
building 0/Bibliothèque numérique/
1/Bibliothèque numérique/Cairn/
description In 1963, Congress voted The Equal Pay Act and in 1964 Title VII of The Civil Rights Act prohibited sex discrimination in the workplace. These laws provided women with essential protections, as they began to enter the workforce in large numbers. The Supreme Court and lower federal courts were instrumental in elaborating jurisprudence under these Acts, striking down gender-biased laws and upholding Affirmative Action plans. In 1978, Title VII was amended so as to protect pregnant women from discrimination policies and in 1986, the Court affirmed that sexual harassment was sex discrimination. Feminist writers and groups have often pondered over the ability of the judicial and legislative powers to advance the cause of women ; and taking stock, they offer contrasting views.
author Happe, François
spellingShingle Happe, François
Bernard Hœpffner. Guy Davenport. Paris : Belin, 1998. 128 p. 50 F.
author_facet Happe, François
author_sort Happe, François
title Bernard Hœpffner. Guy Davenport. Paris : Belin, 1998. 128 p. 50 F.
title_short Bernard Hœpffner. Guy Davenport. Paris : Belin, 1998. 128 p. 50 F.
title_full Bernard Hœpffner. Guy Davenport. Paris : Belin, 1998. 128 p. 50 F.
title_fullStr Bernard Hœpffner. Guy Davenport. Paris : Belin, 1998. 128 p. 50 F.
title_full_unstemmed Bernard Hœpffner. Guy Davenport. Paris : Belin, 1998. 128 p. 50 F.
title_sort bernard hœpffner. guy davenport. paris : belin, 1998. 128 p. 50 f.
publishDate 2001
container_title
container_issue
url https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://shs.cairn.info/revue-francaise-d-etudes-americaines-2001-1-page-112h?lang=fr
_version_ 1877246548292665344

Những quyển sách tương tự