[Annexe] Appel à contribution
The regional psychotrauma centres (RPCs), created following the 19 June 2018 directive, are aimed at all victims of traumatic events, including migrant people. Although migrant psychotrauma is now recognised as a public problem in its own right that needs to be taken into account by government servi...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Lenguaje: | Français |
| Publicado: |
2024
|
| Acceso en línea: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| id |
cairn-RFAS_243_0259 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
cairn |
| spelling |
cairn-RFAS_243_0259RFASRevue française des affaires sociales https://shs.cairn.info/revue-francaise-des-affaires-sociales-2024-3-page-259?lang=fr https://doi.org/10.3917/rfas.243.0259 [Annexe] Appel à contribution Defrasne, Lona2024 fre Revue française des affaires sociales | 243 | 3 | 2024-11-26 | p. 259-273 | 0035-2985 RFAS_24352 The regional psychotrauma centres (RPCs), created following the 19 June 2018 directive, are aimed at all victims of traumatic events, including migrant people. Although migrant psychotrauma is now recognised as a public problem in its own right that needs to be taken into account by government services and health institutions, this article analyses the difficulties involved in the provision of care for migrants in regional psychotrauma centres. The author shows that, while care of this demographic has become less controversial in theory, there remain practical complexities for healthcare professionals, in a context of overcrowding of psychiatric facilities. This article shows that this group, in reality, is only marginally accepted in RPCs: the therapies offered appear to be poorly adapted to people in precarious social situations. While attempts are being made to remedy the situation, offering a differentiated clinical response for migrants, these are not without their challenges: the aim here is to highlight the rationale behind them, but also their limitations.Les centres régionaux de psychotraumatisme (CRP), créés suite à l’instruction du 19 juin 2018, s’adressent à tous types de victimes d’évènements traumatiques, notamment les personnes migrantes. Si le psychotraumatisme des migrants est aujourd’hui reconnu comme un problème public à part entière nécessitant d’être pris en compte par les services de l’État et les institutions sanitaires, cet article analyse les difficultés que posent l’accueil et la prise en charge des migrants dans les centres régionaux de psychotraumatisme. L’autrice démontre que, si la question de leur prise en charge est moins un enjeu de controverses théoriques qu’elle a pu l’être par le passé, elle reste un sujet de perplexité pratique à l’origine d’un trouble pour les professionnels, dans un contexte de saturation de la psychiatrie. Dans les faits, cet article relève que ce public est accueilli à la marge dans les CRP : en effet les thérapies proposées apparaissent peu adaptées aux personnes en situation de précarité sociale. Si des tentatives d’y remédier se développent, proposant une réponse clinique différenciée pour les personnes migrantes, celles-ci ne sont pas sans poser question : il s’agira ici d’en souligner les logiques, mais aussi les limites.Cairn free access |
| language |
Français |
| format |
Article ou chapitre numérique |
| building |
0/Bibliothèque numérique/ 1/Bibliothèque numérique/Cairn/ |
| description |
The regional psychotrauma centres (RPCs), created following the 19 June 2018 directive, are aimed at all victims of traumatic events, including migrant people. Although migrant psychotrauma is now recognised as a public problem in its own right that needs to be taken into account by government services and health institutions, this article analyses the difficulties involved in the provision of care for migrants in regional psychotrauma centres. The author shows that, while care of this demographic has become less controversial in theory, there remain practical complexities for healthcare professionals, in a context of overcrowding of psychiatric facilities. This article shows that this group, in reality, is only marginally accepted in RPCs: the therapies offered appear to be poorly adapted to people in precarious social situations. While attempts are being made to remedy the situation, offering a differentiated clinical response for migrants, these are not without their challenges: the aim here is to highlight the rationale behind them, but also their limitations. |
| author |
Defrasne, Lona |
| spellingShingle |
Defrasne, Lona [Annexe] Appel à contribution |
| author_facet |
Defrasne, Lona |
| author_sort |
Defrasne, Lona |
| title |
[Annexe] Appel à contribution |
| title_short |
[Annexe] Appel à contribution |
| title_full |
[Annexe] Appel à contribution |
| title_fullStr |
[Annexe] Appel à contribution |
| title_full_unstemmed |
[Annexe] Appel à contribution |
| title_sort |
[annexe] appel à contribution |
| publishDate |
2024 |
| container_title |
|
| container_issue |
|
| url |
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://shs.cairn.info/revue-francaise-des-affaires-sociales-2024-3-page-259?lang=fr https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.3917/rfas.243.0259 |
| _version_ |
1877246544158130176 |