Le National Trust : confiance ou défiance ?
In his article, « Der moderne Denkmalkultus. Sein Wesen und seine Entstehung. » (The Modern Cult of Monuments, its Nature and its Origins) published in 1903, Alois Riegl developed his finely dialectic concept of the values that can be attributed to a monument, erected as such or having become such o...
Enregistré dans:
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Langue: | Français |
| Publié: |
2020
|
| Accès en ligne: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| id |
cairn-RDA_209_0005 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
cairn |
| spelling |
cairn-RDA_209_0005RDARevue de l'art https://shs.cairn.info/revue-de-l-art-2020-3-page-5?lang=fr https://doi.org/10.3917/rda.209.0005 Le National Trust : confiance ou défiance ? Jobert, Barthélémy2020 fre Revue de l'art | 209 | 3 | 2020-09-23 | p. 5-7 | 0035-1326 RDA_20920 In his article, « Der moderne Denkmalkultus. Sein Wesen und seine Entstehung. » (The Modern Cult of Monuments, its Nature and its Origins) published in 1903, Alois Riegl developed his finely dialectic concept of the values that can be attributed to a monument, erected as such or having become such over time. In this article, accent is given to the continuous presentification of values in all judgment, tied to a constantly advancing present. Any present, marked by its own antagonisms, will see disagreements around the possible values attributable to a monument. Thus is introduced here the notion of an adversarial value or of a confrontation: the disagreement over the monument articulates a contemporary disagreement that becomes negotiable in the context of a heritage debate.Cairn free access |
| language |
Français |
| format |
Article ou chapitre numérique |
| building |
0/Bibliothèque numérique/ 1/Bibliothèque numérique/Cairn/ |
| description |
In his article, « Der moderne Denkmalkultus. Sein Wesen und seine Entstehung. » (The Modern Cult of Monuments, its Nature and its Origins) published in 1903, Alois Riegl developed his finely dialectic concept of the values that can be attributed to a monument, erected as such or having become such over time. In this article, accent is given to the continuous presentification of values in all judgment, tied to a constantly advancing present. Any present, marked by its own antagonisms, will see disagreements around the possible values attributable to a monument. Thus is introduced here the notion of an adversarial value or of a confrontation: the disagreement over the monument articulates a contemporary disagreement that becomes negotiable in the context of a heritage debate. |
| author |
Jobert, Barthélémy |
| spellingShingle |
Jobert, Barthélémy Le National Trust : confiance ou défiance ? |
| author_facet |
Jobert, Barthélémy |
| author_sort |
Jobert, Barthélémy |
| title |
Le National Trust : confiance ou défiance ? |
| title_short |
Le National Trust : confiance ou défiance ? |
| title_full |
Le National Trust : confiance ou défiance ? |
| title_fullStr |
Le National Trust : confiance ou défiance ? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Le National Trust : confiance ou défiance ? |
| title_sort |
le national trust : confiance ou défiance ? |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| container_title |
|
| container_issue |
|
| url |
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://shs.cairn.info/revue-de-l-art-2020-3-page-5?lang=fr https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.3917/rda.209.0005 |
| _version_ |
1877246446402535424 |