Daniel J.Sherman :Le primitivisme en France et les fins d’empires (1945-1975), Dijon, Les Presses du Réel, collection « Œuvres en société », 2018, 329 p.
In his article, « Der moderne Denkmalkultus. Sein Wesen und seine Entstehung. » (The Modern Cult of Monuments, its Nature and its Origins) published in 1903, Alois Riegl developed his finely dialectic concept of the values that can be attributed to a monument, erected as such or having become such o...
Guardat en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Idioma: | Français |
| Publicat: |
2020
|
| Accés en línia: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| Sumari: | In his article, « Der moderne Denkmalkultus. Sein Wesen und seine Entstehung. » (The Modern Cult of Monuments, its Nature and its Origins) published in 1903, Alois Riegl developed his finely dialectic concept of the values that can be attributed to a monument, erected as such or having become such over time. In this article, accent is given to the continuous presentification of values in all judgment, tied to a constantly advancing present. Any present, marked by its own antagonisms, will see disagreements around the possible values attributable to a monument. Thus is introduced here the notion of an adversarial value or of a confrontation: the disagreement over the monument articulates a contemporary disagreement that becomes negotiable in the context of a heritage debate. |
|---|