Note de lecture sur « Max Weber und Karl Marx » de Karl Löwith (1932)
C. Colliot-Thélène's main contention is that, beyond differences, the deep relationship between Marx and Weber proves them to be the theoreticians of effectivity and of society. They are concerned with the real powers at work in history. Their being read by a philosopher, Habermas, who pretend...
Đã lưu trong:
| Tác giả chính: | |
|---|---|
| Định dạng: | Article ou chapitre numérique |
| Ngôn ngữ: | Français |
| Được phát hành: |
1992
|
| Truy cập trực tuyến: | Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM Accès Université d'Orléans et IFPM |
| id |
cairn-AMX_011_0113 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
cairn |
| spelling |
cairn-AMX_011_0113AMXActuel Marx https://shs.cairn.info/revue-actuel-marx-1992-1-page-113?lang=fr https://doi.org/10.3917/amx.011.0113 Note de lecture sur « Max Weber und Karl Marx » de Karl Löwith (1932) Texier, Jacques1992 fre Actuel Marx | 11 | 1 | 1992-01-01 | p. 113-118 | 0994-4524 AMX_0117 C. Colliot-Thélène's main contention is that, beyond differences, the deep relationship between Marx and Weber proves them to be the theoreticians of effectivity and of society. They are concerned with the real powers at work in history. Their being read by a philosopher, Habermas, who pretends to build a theory of society through communicative reason, results in a forced and illegitimate interpretation. He puts forward, as a reconstruction of historical materialism, a theory of evolution in which cultural factors are the decisive factors of change.Cairn free access |
| language |
Français |
| format |
Article ou chapitre numérique |
| building |
0/Bibliothèque numérique/ 1/Bibliothèque numérique/Cairn/ |
| description |
C. Colliot-Thélène's main contention is that, beyond differences, the deep relationship between Marx and Weber proves them to be the theoreticians of effectivity and of society. They are concerned with the real powers at work in history. Their being read by a philosopher, Habermas, who pretends to build a theory of society through communicative reason, results in a forced and illegitimate interpretation. He puts forward, as a reconstruction of historical materialism, a theory of evolution in which cultural factors are the decisive factors of change. |
| author |
Texier, Jacques |
| spellingShingle |
Texier, Jacques Note de lecture sur « Max Weber und Karl Marx » de Karl Löwith (1932) |
| author_facet |
Texier, Jacques |
| author_sort |
Texier, Jacques |
| title |
Note de lecture sur « Max Weber und Karl Marx » de Karl Löwith (1932) |
| title_short |
Note de lecture sur « Max Weber und Karl Marx » de Karl Löwith (1932) |
| title_full |
Note de lecture sur « Max Weber und Karl Marx » de Karl Löwith (1932) |
| title_fullStr |
Note de lecture sur « Max Weber und Karl Marx » de Karl Löwith (1932) |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Note de lecture sur « Max Weber und Karl Marx » de Karl Löwith (1932) |
| title_sort |
note de lecture sur « max weber und karl marx » de karl löwith (1932) |
| publishDate |
1992 |
| container_title |
|
| container_issue |
|
| url |
https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://shs.cairn.info/revue-actuel-marx-1992-1-page-113?lang=fr https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://doi.org/10.3917/amx.011.0113 |
| _version_ |
1877245488978198528 |