Wrong for the right reasons

The rapidity with which knowledge changes makes much of past science obsolete, and often just wrong, from the present's point of view. We no longer think, for example, that heat is a material substance transferred from hot to cold bodies. But is wrong science always or even usually bad science?...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Buchwald, Jed Z.
Altri autori: Franklin, A. (Redattore), Buchwald, Jed Z., 1949- (Direttore editoriale), Franklin, Allan, 1938- (Direttore editoriale)
Natura: Livre numérique
Lingua:Anglais
Pubblicazione: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands [20..].
Cham : Springer Nature
Edizione:1st ed. 2005.
Serie:Archimedes, New Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology 11
Accesso online:Accès sur la plateforme de l'éditeur
Accès sur la plateforme Istex
Accès Université d'Orléans
Accès INSA CVL
Nota: Archives Springer e-books (Licence nationale)
Archives Springer e-books (Licence nationale)
Autres localisations: Voir dans le Sudoc
Edition sous un autre format:• Wrong for the right reasons, edited by Jed Z. Buchwald and Allan Franklin, Dordrecht, Springer, 2005, 1 vol. (viii-228 p.), Archimedes, 1-402-03047-9
• Wrong for the Right Reasons, Texte imprimé, 9789048167777
• Wrong for the Right Reasons, Texte imprimé, 9789048101672
• Wrong for the right reasons, edited by Jed Z. Buchwald and Allan Franklin, Dordrecht, Springer, 2005, 1 vol. (viii-228 p.), Archimedes, 1-402-03047-9
Sommario:
  • Introduction: Beyond Disunity and Historicism In Order That We Should Not Ourselves Appear to Be Adjusting Our Estimates to Make Them Fit Some Predetermined Amount Ptolemy s Theories of the Latitude of the Planets in the Almagest, Handy Tables, and Planetary Hypotheses Alchemy and the Changing Significance of Analysis Descartes and the Heart Beat: A Conservative Innovation Skating on the Edge: Newton s Investigation of Chromatic Dispersion and Achromatic Prisms and Lenses Was Wrong Newton Bad Newton? Visual Photometry in the Early 19th Century: A Good Science with Wrong Measurements An Error within a Mistake? The Konopinski-Uhlenbeck Theory of ? Decay: Its Proposal and Refutation