The ideology of classicism : language, history, and identity in Dionysius of Halicarnassus

This is the first systematic study of Greek classicism, a crucial element of Graeco-Roman culture under Augustus, from the perspective of cultural identity: what vision of the world and their own role in it motivated Greek and Roman intellectuals to commit themselves to reliving the classical Greek...

पूर्ण विवरण

में बचाया:
ग्रंथसूची विवरण
मुख्य लेखक: Wiater, Nicolas, 1980-
स्वरूप: Thèse numérique
भाषा:Anglais
प्रकाशित: Berlin : De Gruyter 2011.
Berlin ; Boston :
श्रृंखला:Untersuchungen zur antiken Literatur und Geschichte volume 105
विषय:
ऑनलाइन पहुंच:Accès sur la plateforme de l'éditeur
Accès sur la plateforme ISTEX
Accès Université d'Orléans
टिप्पणी: De Gruyter e-books Corpus Sciences de l'Antiquité (Licence nationale)
Autres localisations: Voir dans le Sudoc
Edition sous un autre format:• The ideology of classicism, language, history and identity in Dionysius of Halicarnassus, by Nicolas Wiater, Berlin, De Gruyter, 2011, 1 vol. (XI-395 p.)d24 cm, Untersuchungen zur antiken Literatur und Geschichte, 978-3-11-025658-1
विषय - सूची:
  • Preface
  • 1. Introduction: The Aims and Methods of This Study
  • 1.1 'Webs of Significance' - A Novel Approach to Dionysius' Classicism
  • 1.1.1 Dionysius' Classicism as a Cultural Phenomenon
  • 1.1.2 Dionysius - an 'Augustan' Author ?
  • 1.1.3 A Cultural Identity Approach to Dionysius' Classicism
  • 1.2 The Conceptual Framework of Dionysius' Classicism
  • 1.2.1 Criticism as a Struggle for Authority
  • 1.2.2 Dionysius' Critical Method as Heir to the Tradition of Classical Rhetoric
  • 1.2.3 The Power of the Text: Creating a Discursive Tradition
  • 1.2.4 Criticism as Constituent of Communities of Intellectuals
  • 1.3 Conclusions
  • 2. Reviving the Past: Language and Identity in Dionysius' Classicism
  • 2.1 Introduction: Language and Time in Dionysius' Classicism
  • 2.2 źź, ź, and Continuity
  • 2.2.1 źźg : Learning Classical Identity from Isocrates
  • 2.2.2 Classicist Self-Fashioning: Re-enacting the Past through źb2.3 Language and Power: Getting the Romans into the Picture
  • 2.3.1 Greeks, Romans, Barbarians: Dionysius' Interpretation of Augustan Rome
  • 2.3.2 Dionysius' Interpretation of the Roman Present in Context
  • 2.3.3 Greek or Roman? The Ambiguity of Dionysius' View of Augustan Rome
  • 2.3.4 Coda: How Historical is Dionysius' Model of History?
  • 2.4 Summary
  • 3. History and Criticism: The Construction of a Classicist Past
  • 3.1 'Metahistory' avant la lettre: Dionysius on Historical Writing
  • 3.2 Deconstructing Thucydides
  • 3.2.1 Identifying with the Past: Why Herodotus Succeeded where Thucydides Failed
  • 3.2.2 Classicist History: Theopompus' 'Isocratean' Approach to the Past
  • 3.2.3 Between History and Criticism: Re-writing the Melian Dialogue
  • 3.3 A Greek Past for the Roman Present: The Project of Dionysius' Antiquitates
  • 3.3.1 Ì źÌ Ìa : The Archaeology of Roman Power
  • 3.3.2 Identity and Difference: Be Roman, Go Greek ?
  • 3.4 Summary
  • 4. Knowledge and Elitism: Being a Classicist Critic
  • 4.1 Ì ág źź: Reading and Distinction in Dionysius' Classicism
  • 4.2 'Authentic Reading': Becoming a Classicist Critic
  • 4.2.1 The Failures of Scholarship Past: Redressing the Balance between Theory and Practice
  • 4.2.2 Misreading Tradition: Deconstructing Chrysippus
  • 4.2.3 Refuting the Idea of a 'Natural Word Order'
  • 4.2.4 On Literary Composition : A Normative Aesthetics of Classical Style
  • 4.2.5 Dionysius' Writings: A Classical Course of Education
  • 4.3 The Mysteries of Education: Being an Elite Critic
  • 4.3.1 Knowledge and Elitism
  • 4.3.2 The Mysteries of Knowledge
  • 4.3.3 Classical Politicians and Classicist Readers: Knowledge and Leadership
  • 4.4 Summary
  • 5. Enacting Distinction: The Interactive Structure of Dionysius' Writings
  • 5.1 Criticism as Dialogic Interaction: Creating an 'Imagined Community' of Classicists
  • 5.2 Strategies of Distinction: Out-Group Reading
  • 5.2.1 'Objective Critic' vs 'Subjective Critic': The Peripatetic on Trial
  • 5.2.2 The Aesthetics of Criticism: Dionysius vs the Platonists