Reasoning of state : realists, romantics and rationality in international relations
"Scholars and citizens tend to assume that rationality guides the decision making of our leaders. Brian Rathbun suggests, however, that if we understand rationality to be a cognitive style premised on a commitment to objectivity and active deliberation, rational leaders are, in fact, the except...
Gorde:
| Egile nagusia: | |
|---|---|
| Formatua: | Livre numérique |
| Hizkuntza: | Anglais |
| Argitaratua: |
Cambridge ; New York :
Cambridge University Press
2019.
Cambridge : |
| Saila: | Cambridge studies in international relations
Volume 149 |
| Gaiak: | |
| Sarrera elektronikoa: | Accès sur la plateforme Cambridge University Press Accès sur la plateforme ISTEX (corpus CUP) Accès Université d'Orléans |
| Oharra: |
Cambridge University Press - CUP - Corpus Science politique (Licence nationale) |
| Autres localisations: | Voir dans le Sudoc |
| Edition sous un autre format: | • Reasoning of state, realists, romantics and rationality in international relations, Brian C. Rathbun,..., 2019, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1 volume (XI-333 pages), Cambridge studies in international relations, 978-1-108-44618-1 |
Aurkibidea:
- The psychology of rationality : cognitive style in international relations The three R?s of international relations : realism, romanticism and rationality Little Bismarcks : a laboratory experiment on variation in rational thinking and rational behavior The "Prince" among men : Bismarck?s realpolitik in Prussian politics Cold blood and iron : Bismarck, the struggle with Austria and German unification Blind faith : Richelieu, the devoted, and France in counter-reformation Europe "Blood, toil, tears and sweat" : Churchill, romanticism and the rational appeasement debate "In defeat, defiance" : Churchill in words (1935-39) and in deeds (1940) "Beginning the world all over again" : resolving the paradox of Ronald Reagan Winning one as the Gipper? : Reagan?s administration and American engagement with the Soviet Union Conclusion : the irrationality of rational choice : saving a paradigm from itself