Reasoning of state : realists, romantics and rationality in international relations
"Scholars and citizens tend to assume that rationality guides the decision making of our leaders. Brian Rathbun suggests, however, that if we understand rationality to be a cognitive style premised on a commitment to objectivity and active deliberation, rational leaders are, in fact, the except...
Kaydedildi:
| Yazar: | |
|---|---|
| Materyal Türü: | Livre numérique |
| Dil: | Anglais |
| Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: |
Cambridge ; New York :
Cambridge University Press
2019.
Cambridge : |
| Seri Bilgileri: | Cambridge studies in international relations
Volume 149 |
| Konular: | |
| Online Erişim: | Accès sur la plateforme Cambridge University Press Accès sur la plateforme ISTEX (corpus CUP) Accès Université d'Orléans |
| Not: |
Cambridge University Press - CUP - Corpus Science politique (Licence nationale) |
| Autres localisations: | Voir dans le Sudoc |
| Edition sous un autre format: | • Reasoning of state, realists, romantics and rationality in international relations, Brian C. Rathbun,..., 2019, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1 volume (XI-333 pages), Cambridge studies in international relations, 978-1-108-44618-1 |
| LEADER | 04900nam a22003377a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1462951 | ||
| 008 | 200729t20192019xx ||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 009 | PPN248474774 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781108612937 | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 082 | |a 327.101/9 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Rathbun, Brian C., |d 1973- | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Reasoning of state : |b realists, romantics and rationality in international relations |c Brian C. Rathbun. |
| 260 | |a Cambridge ; |a New York : |b Cambridge University Press. | ||
| 260 | |a Cambridge : |b Cambridge University Press, |c 2019. | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Cambridge studies in international relations |v Volume 149 | |
| 500 | |a Cambridge University Press - CUP - Corpus Science politique (Licence nationale) | ||
| 505 | 1 | |a The psychology of rationality : cognitive style in international relations The three R?s of international relations : realism, romanticism and rationality Little Bismarcks : a laboratory experiment on variation in rational thinking and rational behavior The "Prince" among men : Bismarck?s realpolitik in Prussian politics Cold blood and iron : Bismarck, the struggle with Austria and German unification Blind faith : Richelieu, the devoted, and France in counter-reformation Europe "Blood, toil, tears and sweat" : Churchill, romanticism and the rational appeasement debate "In defeat, defiance" : Churchill in words (1935-39) and in deeds (1940) "Beginning the world all over again" : resolving the paradox of Ronald Reagan Winning one as the Gipper? : Reagan?s administration and American engagement with the Soviet Union Conclusion : the irrationality of rational choice : saving a paradigm from itself | |
| 506 | |a Accès en ligne pour les établissements français bénéficiaires des licences nationales | ||
| 506 | |a Accès soumis à abonnement pour tout autre établissement | ||
| 506 | |a Conditions particulières de réutilisation pour les bénéficiaires des licences nationales. https://www.licencesnationales.fr/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/2023-14_Collex_Cambridge_CCTP.pdf | ||
| 520 | |a "Scholars and citizens tend to assume that rationality guides the decision making of our leaders. Brian Rathbun suggests, however, that if we understand rationality to be a cognitive style premised on a commitment to objectivity and active deliberation, rational leaders are, in fact, the exception - not the norm. Using a unique combination of methods, including laboratory bargaining experiments, archival-based case studies, quantitative textual analysis, and high-level interviews, Rathbun questions some of our basic assumptions about rationality and leadership, with profound implications for the field of international relations. Case studies of Bismarck and Richelieu show that the rationality of realists makes them rare. An examination of Churchill and Reagan, romantics in international politics who sought to overcome obstacles in their path through force of will and personal agency, show what less rationality looks like in foreign policy making"-- | ||
| 520 | |a Scholars and citizens tend to assume that rationality guides the decision-making of our leaders. Brian C. Rathbun suggests, however, that if we understand rationality to be a cognitive style premised on a commitment to objectivity and active deliberation, rational leaders are in fact the exception not the norm. Using a unique combination of methods including laboratory bargaining experiments, archival-based case studies, quantitative textual analysis and high-level interviews, Rathbun questions some of the basic assumptions about rationality and leadership, with profound implications for the field of international relations. Case studies of Bismarck and Richelieu show that the rationality of realists makes them rare. An examination of Churchill and Reagan, romantics in international politics who sought to overcome obstacles in their path through force of will and personal agency, show what less rationality looks like in foreign policy making | ||
| 650 | |a Relations internationales | ||
| 650 | |a Relations internationales |x Prise de décision | ||
| 650 | |a Relations internationales |x Psychologie | ||
| 776 | 0 | |0 234338229 |t Reasoning of state |o realists, romantics and rationality in international relations |f Brian C. Rathbun,... |d 2019 |c Cambridge |n Cambridge University Press |p 1 volume (XI-333 pages) |s Cambridge studies in international relations |z 978-1-108-44618-1 | |
| 856 | 4 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108612937 |z Accès sur la plateforme Cambridge University Press | |
| 856 | 4 | |u https://revue-sommaire.istex.fr/ark:/67375/8Q1-7FPF3XR3-J |z Accès sur la plateforme ISTEX (corpus CUP) | |
| 856 | 4 | |5 452349901:674143868 |u https://ezproxy.univ-orleans.fr/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781108612937 |z Accès Université d'Orléans | |
| 997 | |0 1462951 |1 Livre numérique |a Ressource numérique |b INSA |b ENSA |c 0/Bibliothèque numérique/ |c 1/Bibliothèque numérique/Autre ressource numérique/ | ||